Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley: Beating Marquez Will Put Me in The Hall of Fame

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
    Wait how many rivals was Bradley suppose to fight??Let's see,Witter Holt Alexander..that's even with the same amount of top fighters in the div that Froch fought no??Oh and Bradley went on to fight Pac(P4P num 1 or 2)Khan was not needed..

    I won't go down this road with you again..Cause it's pointless..We both have very different views on the subject..I'm sure tho,Bradley will be alright with his big events/big money fights..
    Witter and Holt weren't his rivals LOL. Nobody knew of Bradley when he was facing Witter and I dunno why everybody talks so big about Holt. Who has he actually beaten? Holt was a gatekeeper at best.

    And please don't talk about Bradley and big money. Bradley will never have as much money as Khan has. Never.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
      Far from that..Taylor Johnson and AA were never num 1 or num 2 in the div when Froch fought umm..Alexander 2 or 3 depending on who you ask..Witter num1..It's nothing like that at all..Sorry try again..

      Oh and BTW Khan was never Bradley main rival either..He was another fighter people wanted Bradley to fight,just like Alexander..AKA he did not have to fight Khan..Which is why he move on to bigger fish..
      We wanted Bradley-Alexander after Alexander had KO'd Urango. Bradley wasn't keen on facing Alexander until Alexander got taken to school by Kotelnik.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
        Come on now,who cares how Mares won um(mind you I was very upset by the Agbeko fight),you guys put far to much into your own opinions and not the reality of a fighters resume..

        Mares has beat every fighter he was in with(outside the draw),not to mention he's fought top ranked opponents one after the other..I don't care how close the fights were..He won um..There is no question that Mares has a better resume then both Froch and Bradley..That's just plan to see imo..

        As for Bradley and 99.99 and Rios and Abril(yada yada),I really don't care bro..Fact remains Bradley won and so did Rios..Nothing you or ya press score can do to change that brother(sorry)..Like I said,Bradley beat Pac and has a legend on the resume..Froch does not have that kinda win,did not unify twice,and is not a two div Champion..Bradley beats him out imo..Oh and btw,I also think Froch and Martinez could be HOF kinda fighters..
        Neither does Bradley, GTFO. Do you really think HOF voters are boxrec warriors? Rios "beating" Abril is not a plus for him like you might think, it's the #1 knock on the guy.

        At this point Mares should be around 5, I got no problem with that. He hasn't fought anyone near as good as Ward or Pac though.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
          Far from that..Taylor Johnson and AA were never num 1 or num 2 in the div when Froch fought umm..Alexander 2 or 3 depending on who you ask..Witter num1..It's nothing like that at all..Sorry try again..

          Oh and BTW Khan was never Bradley main rival either..He was another fighter people wanted Bradley to fight,just like Alexander..AKA he did not have to fight Khan..Which is why he move on to bigger fish..
          Alexander was about 4 or 5 and @ Witter being number 1. Take damn near any of Froch's wins. Any you want and they are almost all better than Bradley's at 140lbs.

          Khan was his main rival. You know it. I know it. The world knew it. That's why everyone wanted that fight to decide who was the man at 140.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by daggum View Post
            am i supposed to take you seriously? bradley didn't give up the edge? what does that even mean? bradley was on ***** street and on the verge of being stopped but because he wasn't stopped you gave the round to bradley? did you give bradley round 1 and 2 as well?
            No I did not give Bradley rds 1 and 2..Oh and I also did not say because Bradley was not KO'd he won the rd..He was winning the rd before he got hurt(clearly as well),and when hurt never gave up the edge..He was punching back until the bell rang..Hurt yes,but almost knockout,did not see that..

            Comment


            • #86
              Nobody but Bradley fans think that Bradley beat Pacquiao.

              JMM ended Pacquiao's winning streak. Not Bradley.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
                Usually if top 3 guys fight they become lineal,, look at ring magazine rules,, and other sanctioning bodies,,, #1 and #2 hardly ever fight each other
                This is up there for one of the dumbest things I've ever read. So anyone in the top 3 can fight to become lineal champ??

                The Ring Champion and lineal champion are different things. Secondly, even if they were the same, the Ring never gave Bradley their belt because he didn't fight his main challenger in Khan.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by wazaa. View Post
                  We wanted Bradley-Alexander after Alexander had KO'd Urango. Bradley wasn't keen on facing Alexander until Alexander got taken to school by Kotelnik.
                  Oh and Bradley wanted to a mill to make the fight a reality..Not Bradley's job to fight for Devon..Oh or Khan for that matter..

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by wazaa. View Post
                    Nobody but Bradley fans think that Bradley beat Pacquiao.

                    JMM ended Pacquiao's winning streak. Not Bradley.
                    But Bradley was popping out that jab man, which gave fresh air a headache because none of those fuvking jabs were landing. But hey at least he was popping it out. That's how he supposedly won his rounds

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                      No I did not give Bradley rds 1 and 2..Oh and I also did not say because Bradley was not KO'd he won the rd..He was winning the rd before he got hurt(clearly as well),and when hurt never gave up the edge..He was punching back until the bell rang..Hurt yes,but almost knockout,did not see that..
                      yea he was winning before he got badly hurt which obviously flipped the round to prod. i would say he gave up the edge since he was trapped on the ropes and taking a beating but ok. was he doing that before getting hurt? no. punching back doesn't mean you are winning. also it should have been a 10-8 round as prod landed a hook that made bradley take a seat on the ropes to prevent from being knocked down. you will probably make an excuse about how sitting on the ropes is outboxing your opponent or some nonsense.
                      Last edited by daggum; 07-29-2013, 06:27 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP