Chicken Run Morales

[dep_violator]

Prior to this fight Pac was very one dimensional. It's not insulting if it's downright true and accepted by all. Tito was also very one dimensional but in his prime people still knew that.

Yeah. yeah... crap coming from the likes of you who ate their words are useless.

Another whiner.

[Dirt E Gomez]

Yeah. yeah... crap coming from the likes of you who ate their words are useless.

Another whiner.

You're seriously a ****ing moron. Even pac fanboys admitted that Pac was one dimensional. This is not open to dispute. It's not an insult to his skill either considering if it's not broke, don't fix it... and it applied to Pac's style.

[SnoopySmurf]

Yeah. yeah... crap coming from the likes of you who ate their words are useless.

Another whiner.

His point is, Pac WAS one dimensional. But since then, he has learned the subtle art of slipping or side stepping a jab. He'll need that against JMM, a very good counter puncher and excellent jabber.

[dep_violator]

You're seriously a ****ing moron. Even pac fanboys admitted that Pac was one dimensional. This is not open to dispute. It's not an insult to his skill either considering if it's not broke, don't fix it... and it applied to Pac's style.

yeah... And I was just smiling when "experts" like you says that PAC can't win as being this and that... now you're eating your words.

The point is... if you can't take the heat... don't reply.

In the first place, I wasn't even talking to you kid.

[Dirt E Gomez]

yeah... And I was just smiling when "experts" like you says that PAC can't win as being this and that... now you're eating your words.

The point is... if you can't take the heat... don't reply.

In the first place, I wasn't even talking to you kid.

Once again, find a post of mine on this forum where I suggest that due to pac's one dimensional fighting style (at the time) he would lose to Morales. I'm eating nothing accept soon to be a bowl of cereal. You make about as much sense as.... honestly, you're so ****ing ******ed I'm not even going to make a good metaphor or analogy there.

[Manny_P]

yeah... And I was just smiling when "experts" like you says that PAC can't win as being this and that... now you're eating your words.

The point is... if you can't take the heat... don't reply.

In the first place, I wasn't even talking to you kid.

don't call expert brah. It'll make his head big.

That guy hasn't made a correct prection fo a while and he always ends up very pissed afterwards.

He said Hop will beat taylor first time, then said Hop will KO Taylor in the 2nd time. LOL! BOTH WRONG. . Now he made a mistake again thunkin Morales will beat Pacman. LOL!!!

Aint that right Durt?

[dep_violator]

don't call expert brah. It'll make his head big.

That guy hasn't made a correct prection fo a while and he always ends up very pissed afterwards.

He said Hop will beat taylor first time, then said Hop will KO Taylor in the 2nd time. LOL! BOTH WRONG. . Now he made a mistake again thunkin Morales will beat Pacman. LOL!!!

Aint that right Durt?

lol! I was trying to avoid that Manny_P because I knew it would hurt his feelings. But he kept on insisting.

Besides I wans't even talking to him and yet he kept whining.

[Dirt E Gomez]

don't call expert brah. It'll make his head big.

That guy hasn't made a correct prection fo a while and he always ends up very pissed afterwards.

He said Hop will beat taylor first time, then said Hop will KO Taylor in the 2nd time. LOL! BOTH WRONG. . Now he made a mistake again thunkin Morales will beat Pacman. LOL!!!

Aint that right Durt?

I swear to god you guys have to be brothers to be this ******. I wasn't even making posts on this forum for Hopkins/Taylor I to make a prediction, and in Hopkins/Taylor II I predicted Hopkins would win a UD... and now you're also suggesting I thought morales would KO pac or even win. Find a post of mine on this forum which contains my prediction on this fight or shut the **** up.

[Manny_P]

I swear to god you guys have to be brothers to be this ******. I wasn't even making posts on this forum for Hopkins/Taylor I to make a prediction, and in Hopkins/Taylor II I predicted Hopkins would win a UD... and now you're also suggesting I thought morales would KO pac or even win. Find a post of mine on this forum which contains my prediction on this fight or shut the **** up.

trust me Ive read yo posts. Some OK, some extremely biased and even some the length of idiotic.

You're one of the people that said Hop won BOTH THE FIGHTS. I mean I dunno, that's just way biased.

[Dirt E Gomez]

trust me Ive read yo posts. Some OK, some extremely biased and even some the length of idiotic.

You're one of the people that said Hop won BOTH THE FIGHTS. I mean I dunno, that's just way biased.

I know you... of all people... didn't just accuse me of being biased. I think Hop either drew both fights or won, but I didn't score either for Taylor winning.... and plenty of others felt this way as well. Both were extremely close fights and with judges always having rounds open to interpretation it allows for different viewpoints to allow a winner of the fight. In Hopkins/Taylor I judges awarded Taylor for aggression while I awarded Hop for masterful defense. BOth fights were open to interpretation and I don't think scoring either for Taylor was outside the realm of possibilities, despite my personal feelings on who won.