If Lomachenko isn't the best of all time, i'm calling him a hype job

[Ezzard Charles]

mandatory drug testing for this kid.... u know he's on that ****.

[Ezzard Charles]

I heard his amateur record is 396-1 if true thats insane lol

that's bull****....

cos he's definitely lost two fights....

against albert selimov.

[_original_]

I've honestly only seen a few clips of him, looks good but it's completely unfair to put that type of pressure on somebody who has yet had their pro debut.

[Weebler I]

He looks like he has the goods, but he can all all the skills in the world and if his chin isnt very good he'll be in trouble. That's the biggest question IMO when a really good amateur transitions from amateur to pro.

He's pretty hard to hit because he keeps moving in and out at a high speed. It's like someone's pressed fast-forward on a video.

If he runs into trouble it'll be against someone with exceptional timing.

[Caestus]

I'm not trying to act tough. It's just basic physics. A 120lb man isn't going to be able to ko a 210lb man. I can curl more then he ways.

Dudes move up 1 weight class and their punches have less effect. Move up 90 lbs, and see what effect his punches have. It's laughable to me. Again, not trying to be a bad ass, but that's just the way it is. Ive played sports all my life. Football being one of them. Quick little explosive guys that way 160-170, and they get steamrolled easily.

I'm not scared of a 120lb man.

Your physics theories are wrong.One example, here in Spain, an amateur boxer of 60 kg or so Knocked out cold a very big roided up african doorman with only one punch, I think he was/is in jail for that or maybe was for another of his street fights.

Lomachenko kick your ass.

[titan m]

that's bull****....

cos he's definitely lost two fights....

against albert selimov.

You are wrong I think, I have the Selimov trilogy and he only lost the first fight in 2007. Lomachenko beat Selimov in the 2008 Olympics and again this year in the WSB.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Look for lomanchenko vs Chris John in the future.... Probably in Macau... If we dont get donaire vs John first...

[bojangles1987]

here's the only question that matters:


Lomos?

Lomatards?

Lomachenkians?

or Lomosexuals?

Lomosexuals, not even a debate.

[Ezzard Charles]

You are wrong I think, I have the Selimov trilogy and he only lost the first fight in 2007. Lomachenko beat Selimov in the 2008 Olympics and again this year in the WSB.

they fought 5 times.... and he lost 2 times.

[New England]

Lomosexuals, not even a debate.

most of the feedback i've recieved has been similar.


Lomosexuals it is.