Can anyone explain this please?

[StarPower]

me personally, i'd like to have seen him not be a corrupt biased little piece of **** and have display consistent neutrality. i think that's what a referee is meant to do if i'm not mistaken. he was definitely third man in the ring...

You didnt answer the question. What would you have had him do differently?

[frosty-g]

You didnt answer the question. What would you have had him do differently?

erm right...
i would have him behave in a way that couldn't be seen as corrupt, that couldn't be seen as biased, couldn't be seen as behaving like a little ****, and that was neutral.

if you can't understand that then so be it.