GGG vs Tito

[bojangles1987]

Little early for this, no?

Not really. Trinidad was a good middleweight. Golovkin is a good middleweight.

I'd take Golovkin.

[JoeKidd]

Trinidad was too easy to hit. No contest.

[Hallaqsillaq]

Trinidad was too easy to hit. No contest.

It took a former LHW to KO Tito. A damn leyend of the sport. People forget too easily...

Too early to tell, for all we know it might be GGG who might have been KO'd.

[JoeKidd]

It took a former LHW to KO Tito. A damn leyend of the sport. People forget too easily...

Too early to tell, for all we know it might be GGG who might have been KO'd.

Quite possible. Tito definitely was not a back-peddler...a fan fave.

[MartinC]

I have seen GGG face anybody that suggests he can do what Bhop did.

[JoeKidd]

I have seen GGG face anybody that suggests he can do what Bhop did.

Can you say that again Sam?

[Gary Coleman]

I voted Tito without realizing the fight would be taking place at 160. Still, OG triple G has yet to beat a top contender to judge just how good he is or isn't. He looks impressive, but I'm not buying...yet.

[DosRounds]

Triniadad en DosRounds! Who has Golovlin faced?

[Humean]

Trinidad was not a cheater, the handwraps thing is a load of nonsense.

I rate Golovkin really highly but have yet to see him in the ring with anyone as big a puncher as Trinidad. Too early to make this judgment but it would be about who can take each others big shots. My su****ion favours Golovkin though.

[Canelo Phresh]

Trinidad was an atg welterweight and a great jr middle weight not middleweight.