I don't blame him because there's not much rationale in hating Bradley. The only legit reason I can see is him avoiding Khan and that was a business decision in order to set himself up for a more lucrative fight in Pacquiao
bradley is a warrior, and he'll always have a place in my heart for that, but he's overrated. ring magazine sucks, but they've got the most looked at p4p list in the world, and they've got bradley 8th or 9th. what a joke that is.
bradley is a warrior, and he'll always have a place in my heart for that, but he's overrated. ring magazine sucks, but they've got the most looked at p4p list in the world, and they've got bradley 8th or 9th. what a joke that is.
life and death with provodnikov. life and death.
Is this some kinda of a joke??Bradley is on the P4P list(and imo should be higher)cause of overall resume and accomplishments..I dear you to tell me 3 fighters who should be on there over him..Base off their whole career..
Is this some kinda of a joke??Bradley is on the P4P list(and imo should be higher)cause of overall resume and accomplishments..I dear you to tell me 3 fighters who should be on there over him..Base off their whole career..
Guillermo Rigondeaux and Carl Froch are no brainers. I'd still put Donaire ahead of him, though that's not a no brainer.
Guillermo Rigondeaux and Carl Froch are no brainers. I'd still put Donaire ahead of him, though that's not a no brainer.
If Bradley's on there, it's 9th or 10th.
Rigo with 12 wins does not belong on any P4P list at all..IMO Donaire does not belong on the P4P list either with the way he loss to Rigo..Froch is not on the P4P list already??If not he clearly belongs on there..Even tho Bradley is still more accomplish then Froch as well..
Rigo with 12 wins does not belong on any P4P list at all..IMO Donaire does not belong on the P4P list either with the way he loss to Rigo..Froch is not on the P4P list already??If not he clearly belongs on there..Even tho Bradley is still more accomplish then Froch as well..
P4P wtf are Broner and Alvarez..
Rigo is a no brainer. You don't dominate a top 5 p4per and not get on the list. And no, Froch is not on it. He belongs ahead of Bradley.
The final 3 of the Ring list is Broner, then Bradley, then Alvarez. Take the obviously biased Broner and Alvarez off that list and replace them with Rigo and Froch. Bradley could get in at 10th then, the top 7 all belong.
Rigo is a no brainer. You don't dominate a top 5 p4per and not get on the list. And no, Froch is not on it. He belongs ahead of Bradley.
The final 3 of the Ring list is Broner, then Bradley, then Alvarez. Take the obviously biased Broner and Alvarez off that list and replace them with Rigo and Froch. Bradley could get in at 10th then, the top 7 all belong.
I just can't agree that a fighter with 12 wins belongs anywhere on the P4P list..To each it's own tho..Froch belongs,ahead of Bradley can't agree with that..Bradley is more accomplished then Froch which is one of the main things I base my P4P list on..I would not argue to hard on it tho..Broner and Alvarez or not on my list..Bradley is about 7th or 6th..Rigo is also out..I stand strong,12 wins..Not enough of a story imo..
I just can't agree that a fighter with 12 wins belongs anywhere on the P4P list..To each it's own tho..Froch belongs,ahead of Bradley can't agree with that..Bradley is more accomplished then Froch which is one of the main things I base my P4P list on..I would not argue to hard on it tho..Broner and Alvarez or not on my list..Bradley is about 7th or 6th..Rigo is also out..I stand strong,12 wins..Not enough of a story imo..
The *** does it matter how many fights he's had? Rigondeaux absolutely schooled a top 5 p4p fighter. Made him look like a bum. He's done what Bradley has never and will never do in his 12th fight.
And skill wise? LOL....Bradley looks like a 12 fight novice in comparison.
Comment