Mayweather beats Golovkin

[Silky_Smooth]

100% agree.

Floyd is just too quick for GGG. I was impressed with GGG, but he was getting hit by Macklin's slow uppercuts, so he's not worthy of fighting Floyd just yet.

Definitely. Floyd would tag him all night and break him down like he does to everyone else. When will people learn?

[Silky_Smooth]

Dan Rafael @danrafaelespn 1m
I have people saying Floyd should fight GGG at 154. Um, OK. He wouldn't fight Pacquiao but he'd fight that beast? Please, people. #never

................. /thread

Lol citing Fat Dan as if he has any credibility. GTFO son.

I read only the last line... Ward ko's ggg? Seriously do you even watch boxing? Do you know anything about it? That has to be the worst thing I've read in a while. Ward wins decisions...

Do you even watch boxing? Go watch Ward's last fight, ******.

[T18Z]

Definitely. Floyd would tag him all night and break him down like he does to everyone else. When will people learn?

Ward KO'd a highly weight drained Chad Dawson, who also just got TKO'D in round 1 vs Stevenson, lol, pathetic example.

Golovkin has the amateur boxing skills to tag Floyd, difference is when Floyd gets hit he WILL get hurt. Floyd also won't be able to escape, going toe to toe or being caught on the ropes will result in a body shot that will make Mayweathers liver explode.

Miguel Cotto had success with Mayweather, Gennady is so much better at everything Cotto does.

[Silky_Smooth]

I'm a fan of both fighters, Floyd is my current favorite, I don't see him beating GGG IF GGG can make 154 and be 100%. GGG is actually not that predictable and he beat Dirrell in the amateurs so he can adjust to speed. Floyd with 10 Oz gloves is slower than usual and he's 36 yrs old, his reflexes aren't as sharp as they used to be, wouldn't be a fair matchup.

Please don't bring up a fight with Dirrell to make a point. Dirrell is one of the dumbest fighters I have ever seen. He's a perfect example of somebody who has no idea how to utilize his speed and talent. Golovkin may have adjusted to Dirrell's speed, but when you're in there with Floyd it's something completely different.

And Floyd obviously isn't as fast as he used to be, but he's still fast enough.

[Flash13]

Do you even watch boxing? Go watch Ward's last fight, ******.

You are comparing a weight drained Dawson (like wards first ko in a long while) who just got knocked out in the first round of his last fight to ggg who has NEVER been knocked down... It's a really bad prediction.

[Silky_Smooth]

Ward KO'd a highly weight drained Chad Dawson, who also just got TKO'D in round 1 vs Stevenson, lol, pathetic example.

Golovkin has the amateur boxing skills to tag Floyd, difference is when Floyd gets hit he WILL get hurt. Floyd also won't be able to escape, going toe to toe or being caught on the ropes will result in a body shot that will make Mayweathers liver explode.

Miguel Cotto had success with Mayweather, Gennady is so much better at everything Cotto does.

Excuses, excuses. You said Ward doesn't get knockouts and you were wrong. Deal with it.

Cotto had success? Because he won 3 rounds? You see the high standards that you guys hold Floyd to? You are inadvertently admitting how great he is. And Cotto is faster than Golovkin so I don't see GGG having as much "success" as Cotto did.

[Light_Speed]

Please don't bring up a fight with Dirrell to make a point. Dirrell is one of the dumbest fighters I have ever seen. He's a perfect example of somebody who has no idea how to utilize his speed and talent. Golovkin may have adjusted to Dirrell's speed, but when you're in there with Floyd it's something completely different.

And Floyd obviously isn't as fast as he used to be, but he's still fast enough.

Dirrell is one of the dumbest fighters you've ever seen? The same Dirrell that should have got the nod against Froch? The same Dirrell that exposed Abraham and laid the blueprint on how to beat him? I can't have a serious debate with somebody who makes that kind of statement.

[T18Z]

Excuses, excuses. You said Ward doesn't get knockouts and you were wrong. Deal with it.

Cotto had success? Because he won 3 rounds? You see the high standards that you guys hold Floyd to? You are inadvertently admitting how great he is. And Cotto is faster than Golovkin so I don't see GGG having as much "success" as Cotto did.

I never said that, are you ******? I think you should think before you speak.

As I said, Cotto is a gatekeeper, Golovkin is the real deal.

[Silky_Smooth]

Dirrell is one of the dumbest fighters you've ever seen? The same Dirrell that should have got the nod against Froch? The same Dirrell that exposed Abraham and laid the blueprint on how to beat him? I can't have a serious debate with somebody who makes that kind of statement.

Abraham was a middleweight fighting at 168. Dirrell beat him because his talent and size were too much. Dirrell is dumb. When he's faced with adversity he can't adjust. If he were smarter, the Froch fight wouldn't have been as close as it was. But I agree he deserved to win that fight.

[Silky_Smooth]

I never said that, are you ******? I think you should think before you speak.

As I said, Cotto is a gatekeeper, Golovkin is the real deal.

Sorry I mixed you up with the other noob that was arguing with me. Regardless, you are still wrong.