Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Erik Morales (Barrera 1) vs. Guillermo Rigondeaux (Donaire) @ 122lbs?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by El-blanco View Post
    Morales was a great fighter. The fact that he challenged Garcia and maidana when he was fat tells you how incredible he once was. Also tells you how overrated this era is that two rated guys struggled with him at his advanced age.
    Morales & Barrera are ATG's for a reason

    Comment


    • #32
      eh....im leaning toward el terrible because of rigos chin...that said. I dont care how great he is you cant wash away the raheem fight... he looked lost against a better boxer. And rigo got skills

      Comment


      • #33
        50/50 fight. I picked Rigo just because I had to pick someone.

        P.S. Deontay Wilder is a glass jawed fraud.

        Comment


        • #34
          History doesn't lie inferior boxers than Rigo beat Morales around said time, Rigo is all kinds of wrong for that beast. Styles make fights.

          Comment


          • #35
            Morales would beat rigo... End of story...

            Comment


            • #36
              Morales would beat the fried bananas out of Rigondeaux, .

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by DannYankee09 View Post
                History doesn't lie inferior boxers than Rigo beat Morales around said time, Rigo is all kinds of wrong for that beast. Styles make fights.
                Lmao.... You have no idea what you are talking about...


                Name the inferior fighters that beat morales at 122

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by B Phontain View Post
                  eh....im leaning toward el terrible because of rigos chin...that said. I dont care how great he is you cant wash away the raheem fight... he looked lost against a better boxer. And rigo got skills

                  Noone looked good against Raheem.. And that was the fat El Terrible at 135.. Not the beast at 122

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
                    Noone looked good against Raheem.. And that was the fat El Terrible at 135.. Not the beast at 122
                    Exactly.... Dudes trying to talk about a 122 morales, yet only bring up past prime 130-135 morales....

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
                      Noone looked good against Raheem.. And that was the fat El Terrible at 135.. Not the beast at 122
                      Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
                      Exactly.... Dudes trying to talk about a 122 morales, yet only bring up past prime 130-135 morales....
                      lol I was just about to go to boxrec and check like who the fuck can this dude be talking about.

                      These dudes dont know boxing aswell as they think they do. Morales never really started losing till he was past prime.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP