Comments Thread For: Video: Adriien Broner Discusses Malignaggi Title Victory

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

Bill Emes catches up with WBA welterweight champion Adrien Broner to discuss his victory over Paulie Malignaggi and what's next.
[Click Here To Read More]

[Jc8804]

You lost last nigh Adrien. Paulie did his thing

[MDPopescu]

Ringside punch stats showed Broner landing 246 of 524 punches while Malignaggi landed 214 of 843. But while Malignaggi looked like the busier fighter, Broner landed punches that seemed to score a lot more heavily.

[dudeiknow]

so after the fight broner says "aint no more beef, thats my man"...... ummmmmm... im not sure if broner is serious or just retarted

[MDPopescu]

I hope Broner will bring all his future opponents' girlfriends/wives with him at the weigh-in.

[LOWBLOW_CHAMP]

broner looked ok lets see him fight maidana next thats who my vote is

[umop-ap!sdn]

Broner easily won the fight 8 - 4 or 7 - 5. 9 - 3 was not even far fetched. 7 - 5 imo was giving Paulie "hometown" rounds, because realistically there is no way he won more than 4 [guaranteed] rounds at the most. AB threw less and landed more, hugely out-landed Paulie in power shots and barely got hit flush in the head the whole fight. So for all of you that have been crying robbery, are you telling me (as a boxing fan/analyst/expert or whatever you want to call yourself) that Paulie won that fight by landing LESS punches, most of those shots being slapping body shots? Would REALLY love an answer from one of you. And please make it a logical one with stats and facts or don't say anything at all.

I'll even make it a little juicier. To win the fight Paulie would have to have won at least 7 rounds correct? So how about this. Any of you Broner hating fanboys who can rewatch that fight and post me the 7 rounds that Malignaggi won, I will donate all my points to you. I humbly offer this as I do not have much, but I am willing to put my money (points) where my mouth is and admit Paulie won if one of you can logically prove it to me. Hey, i'm an AB fan so I may be missing something. I'd love for one of you to step up and put your reputations on the line in defence of good ol' pitter patter on this one.

Anyone?

[MDPopescu]

Broner easily won the fight 8 - 4 or 7 - 5. 9 - 3 was not even far fetched. 7 - 5 imo was giving Paulie "hometown" rounds, because realistically there is no way he won more than 4 [guaranteed] rounds at the most. AB threw less and landed more, hugely out-landed Paulie in power shots and barely got hit flush in the head the whole fight. So for all of you that have been crying robbery, are you telling me (as a boxing fan/analyst/expert or whatever you want to call yourself) that Paulie won that fight by landing LESS punches, most of those shots being slapping body shots? Would REALLY love an answer from one of you. And please make it a logical one with stats and facts or don't say anything at all.

I'll even make it a little juicier. To win the fight Paulie would have to have won at least 7 rounds correct? So how about this. Any of you Broner hating fanboys who can rewatch that fight and post me the 7 rounds that Malignaggi won, I will donate all my points to you. I humbly offer this as I do not have much, but I am willing to put my money (points) where my mouth is and admit Paulie won if one of you can logically prove it to me. Hey, i'm an AB fan so I may be missing something. I'd love for one of you to step up and put your reputations on the line in defence of good ol' pitter patter on this one.

Anyone?

Do not overreact -- it was an easy fight.

[RiC-DiC]

the haters who say Paulie was robbed are the same people who cried tears of joy when they heard the rumour that Errol Spence KO'd Broner in sparring lmao

[Jaliscoguey13]

I was rooting for Paulie, but Broner did win that fight. It was closer than I thought it would be.

Broner did not prove that he is an elite fighter against Paulie. I was not impressed with Broner specially since both Hatton and Kahn were able to stop Paulie.