It was a split decision but it was really a unanimous decision

**M Bison** · 06-23-2013, 01:07 PM

Originally posted by killamoneymike

I cant understand how like half the ppl are saying "ohh split decision Broner got exposed". Some ppl even are acting as if Broner winning the decision was a travesty or something. But meanwhile, if you had eyes and you actually watched the fight, you could see Broner really won nearly every round. It was pretty much a "helluva beating", as Broner said it would be.

I was going for Paulie and I was trying to score rounds for him biasedly whenever I could but I just couldnt do it. Broner was landing the more effective punching, in almost every round. Snapping Paulies head back and just landing the only real punches of the fight.

Whenever Paulie would score it would look like baby punches to the stomach and very few punches to the head with only sparring session sort of impact. When Paulie would put combinations Adrien's body it looked like a baby putting combinations on a buffalo or something. Just not affecting AB at all really. You can say all you want about volume, but Paul really wasnt landing anything. Broner too hard in the body for those to do anything.

I am disapointed Broner won because he is a clown and I dont like him. But I cannot say Paulie even came close to winning. Not to mention I really dont know how it was even a split. And then lol Paulie comes on talking about how the judging is corrupt...If anything they are corrupt for almost giving him the decision.

"helluva beating"
When you type remarks like that how do you expect people to take you seriously?
Boxing is more than just throwing power punches, Malignaggi was landing more shots on Broner albeit not the strong punches but Paulie will never be renowned for being a power puncher.

What is more a travesty is you have morons like yourself sitting there trying to down play a fantastic career best display from Paulie, he gave Broner a fight and a half and quite honestly Broner was extremely lucky to get a decision, at best Broner deserved a draw in no way did he fight the fight to win a world championship belt.

End of the day boxing fans should know landing a shot clean on your opponent is what matters, shots that land are scoring shot it doesn't matter If its a light shot or not.

Can we also go onto the fact that Broner was constantly fouling Malignaggi without any stern warning from the referee?
The point deductions that should of happened at the very least 1 point should of been took off of Broner and possibly another for the constant rabbit punches.
If you're going to come on here and try to justify the unjustifiable atleast make a better attempt of it.

**killamoneymike** · 06-23-2013, 01:08 PM

hey dumass, if you can read, you'd see that helluva beating line is me quoting Broner. **** you and your opinion. Theres nothing wrong with my summary of the fight.

**killamoneymike** · 06-23-2013, 01:11 PM

and now that I read your post you just sound hella mad about Malignaggi losing. its ok take a breath..I wanted Malignaggi to win too but the difference is I dont have his nuts 8 inches down my throat like you do and I can live with it and still look at the fight an objective manner.

**buckfangs** · 06-23-2013, 01:11 PM

Paulie gets points for be the aggressor, if he fought like Broner did we'd be waiting all night for a punch to be thrown a la Banks-Mitchell

**croz** · 06-23-2013, 01:12 PM

It's actually ******ed how people are trying to suggest this fight was close. Canelo vs Trout was a much closer fight than this was. Paulie looked good at the start but as time went by every time Paulie tried to land a combo Broner would deflect and pound him with one of his own.

**Pr23** · 06-23-2013, 01:19 PM

You said this fight was pretty much a helluva beating as broner said it would be. No it wasn't Broner I thought won a close fight but it was not even close to being a beating. What Cotto did to a prime Paulie breaking his face n orbital bone that was a beating not what we saw last night

**killamoneymike** · 06-23-2013, 01:20 PM

I would score for Paulie being the agressor and landing more but it was clear as day Broner had more pop and was landing more damage so that supersedes everything.

Damage>pressure/everything else.

**killamoneymike** · 06-23-2013, 01:22 PM

Originally posted by Pr23

You said this fight was pretty much a helluva beating as broner said it would be. No it wasn't Broner I thought won a close fight but it was not even close to being a beating. What Cotto did to a prime Paulie breaking his face n orbital bone that was a beating not what we saw last night

It was a helluva beating AS BRONER WOULD PUT IT. Because we all know how he exagerrates. And yes he was acting as if it was a helluva beating watch the post fight press conference.

**Pr23** · 06-23-2013, 01:24 PM

Originally posted by killamoneymike

It was a helluva beating AS BRONER WOULD PUT IT. Because we all know how he exagerrates. And yes he was acting as if it was a helluva beating watch the post fight press conference.

He acted like it but we all know it wasn't

It was a split decision but it was really a unanimous decision