Anyone who says Khan is just being ******... and this is coming from someone who dislikes both Broner and Khan equally. Despite people constantly reiterating triangle theories are useless, they still seem to hold weight in peoples minds. They think "Khan looked great against Paulie and Broner didn't so Khan must be better" well that is total BS. Boxing is deeper and much more complex than that. Khan looked great against Paulie because fighting someone with no power takes away Khans biggest weakness, his poor chin and defense. He was able to be reckless without consequence therefore being able to show off his assets. Broner didn't do so well against Paulie because he fought with lots of movement of the feet and head. Khan against Broner is a different story. Khan literally jumps in to throw his shots.... literally jumps... he would get caught with a counter like in every fight he is in except this time the power will be enough to KO him like Danny did. People still can't see past Khans speed... Khan is only good against feather fisted opponents, anyone who has half decent power will usually beat him.
Adrien Broner vs Amir Khan
Collapse
-
-
Anyone who says Khan is just being ******... and this is coming from someone who dislikes both Broner and Khan equally. Despite people constantly reiterating triangle theories are useless, they still seem to hold weight in peoples minds. They think "Khan looked great against Paulie and Broner didn't so Khan must be better" well that is total BS. Boxing is deeper and much more complex than that. Khan looked great against Paulie because fighting someone with no power takes away Khans biggest weakness, his poor chin and defense. He was able to be reckless without consequence therefore being able to show off his assets. Broner didn't do so well against Paulie because he fought with lots of movement of the feet and head. Khan against Broner is a different story. Khan literally jumps in to throw his shots.... literally jumps... he would get caught with a counter like in every fight he is in except this time the power will be enough to KO him like Danny did. People still can't see past Khans speed... Khan is only good against feather fisted opponents, anyone who has half decent power will usually beat him.Comment
-
People simply have this blind hate for Broner to the point that they only want to see him lose and put these unrealistic fights in their minds.
Fact is the chances that Broner fights Guerrero, Lucas etcetc. Is slim to none.
Broner-Khan could realistically happen and the main reason I would want to see it is for Khan's work rate and volume of punches.
He has a glass chin but whatever. He doesn't et tired and Broner doesn't throw counters between opponent's flurries like Floyd does. Which makes the fight intereting to see. Khan has the tools to beat Broner and vice verse.
Which is what boxing fans should want to see not this obsession with a boxer losing. You hate a guy so much that you only want to see them lose and won't be satisfied unless they lose.Comment
-
A strong wind beats Khan (sorry Khan threads demand chin jokes is required look it up)...but honest opinion Broner may not hit that hard at 147 but he does hit you with surprising never see coming shots, dirty and clean ones and that is disaster for Khan who gets surprised by slow bus drivers.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Don't kid yourself, he can. Garcia is not a huge puncher, and it doesn't even take a Garcia to make his legs go. And Broner seems like a good finisher, if nothing else. He just never had Paulie anywhere close to that point.Comment
-
Comment