Not So "B(r)onafied"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Box3r
    Contender
    • May 2010
    • 343
    • 26
    • 0
    • 9,718

    #1

    Not So "B(r)onafied"

    New name for Broner.. The guys a fraud..
  • bojangles1987
    bo jungle
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 41118
    • 1,326
    • 357
    • 63,028

    #2
    Not bad. I can see someone using "Bronafied" if Broner ever impressively won a big fight. Why not use it the way you are when he looks average?

    Comment

    • MindBat
      floyd gobbler
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2006
      • 16853
      • 571
      • 841
      • 25,210

      #3
      We're probably judging Broner too soon. Can't really go by this fight with Paulie. His sole intention was to walk Paulie down and beat him without getting too fancy.

      He did show flashes of combos, and is stronger. But knowing Paulie couldn't hurt him in the least, he decided to minimize his arsenal to a few punches he knew could hurt Paulie and get him the win.

      Would definitely like to see him against Mathysse and Maidana. Just about everyone wants to see those fights.

      Comment

      • mathed
        molṑn labé
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 54551
        • 2,742
        • 2,984
        • 224,675

        #4
        This dude gets stomped out by Thurman, Bradley, Khan, Alexander, Mayweather, Matthysse, Providnikov, Guerrero, Abregu, and van Heerden.

        He might as well run back to lightweight.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP