Williamson might be the biggest joke in the history of boxing besides...butterbean?
A question to Wlad fans...
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ChrististheAnswerI agree completely. But you could also use that as an argument to say that this is the only reason why people think Wlad will become champ aagain. In almost any other era Wlad would have been written off long ago. He is being given these second chances becasue he is a marketabe figher in a medicore division.
However this doesn't mean he will become champion.
exactly
I agree 100%Comment
-
Comment
-
Well seeing on how your savior bounced back from a devastating KO from IKE and a one sided ass whoopin from WLADAMIR KLITSCHKO, I think he might be able to make some noise still!Originally posted by ChrististheAnswerIf Wlad losses tonight will you finally admitt that he is finished as a contendor and should retire?
Because even his own brother said that if Wlad losses he will advise him to retire.
man you sound ignorant with this thread and your name.
LOL
Comment
-
And add onto that how weak the division is under 30 years old. The heavyweight division is going to get a lot worse before it gets better.Originally posted by ChrististheAnswerI agree completely. But you could also use that as an argument to say that this is the only reason why people think Wlad will become champ aagain. In almost any other era Wlad would have been written off long ago. He is being given these second chances becasue he is a marketabe figher in a medicore division.
However this doesn't mean he will become champion.Comment
-
Originally posted by ChrististheAnswerIf Wlad losses tonight will you finally admitt that he is finished as a contendor and should retire?
Because even his own brother said that if Wlad losses he will advise him to retire.
Why did you post this thread? To be a ****? Congratulations. You succeeded. You are indeed, a ****.Comment
-
Why didn't anyone write off Tyson after he lost once to Douglas and twice to Holyfield? The reason was that Tyson had talent. Wlad also has talent but people insist on writing him off, why is that? One reason I can think of is because he is European and white and people are ****ing racist towards him because of it. No one wil admit to it but I am sure that is the reason.Comment
-
Tyson and Wlad aren't in the same boat. I do see what you are saying however. I don't think it has anything to do with his race. There aren't too many people running around on this forum calling white boxers "crackers" or other slurs...however you do see people calling black fighters "darkies" and so on (Eyeh8you for example). It would be sad if people wrote off Wlad because of his race, but I think it has more to do in the fact that he is somewhat disappointing.Originally posted by ejk22Why didn't anyone write off Tyson after he lost once to Douglas and twice to Holyfield? The reason was that Tyson had talent. Wlad also has talent but people insist on writing him off, why is that? One reason I can think of is because he is European and white and people are ****ing racist towards him because of it. No one wil admit to it but I am sure that is the reason.Comment
Comment