Tweet
I read forums sometimes and I came across a few people talking about great wars they come across but in reality it's all about how the person's personal feelings towards a fighter. These are perfect examples
Ward destroy Froch and dawson but he's boriing? Devon makes prudy a punching bag he boring? Floyd puts on a master class against a supposedly game Guerrero now it's Floyd fought Guerrero was scared to engage and he's boring? Manny fights Clottey o man it's a great display of skill even though it was a boring as fight where manny couldn't land yet people make excuses for him and say it's Clottey fight manny couldn't change up his offense. Manny pummels dlh o man great fight he so action pack beating a dead man walking. Froch Throws jabs all night against Kesseler, with a few flurries and it was a great fight?. It goes on and on just admit your bias and leave it alone.
Now real great fights go a little something like this, Rios Alvarado 1 and 2, Pac Marquez 1,2. Floyd and Chavez, Floyd and Augusta, Tyson Holyfield, Bradly Provodniko, Just examples I could go on but the trend is these fights are fights where both guys get touched and It makes things intriguing.
Masterclass boxing examples. Whitaker vs dlh, Floyd vs Diego, Ward vs Dawson, Mares vs Ponce, Klits vs everybody as of late, Broner vs demarco. Juan Marquez vs Katsidis. Manny vs drained marg,
My point is fights where both guys are somewhat challenged Makes for great fights but we can't hate on a fight of fighter just because a fight looks good on paper then one guy gets in the ring and makes the other guy look like a fool. That's the problem with boxing fans. boxing fans need to be more like ufc fans.
Example, almost all gsp fights boring but I still like him because he in a class on his own, Silvia dominates most guys he fight but I still watch him, Cain Made big foot his biotch 2 times people still paid for that no complaints and feel satisfied doing so. All fights looked good on paper one guy outclass the other guy. Why is boxing held to such high standards?
Ward destroy Froch and dawson but he's boriing? Devon makes prudy a punching bag he boring? Floyd puts on a master class against a supposedly game Guerrero now it's Floyd fought Guerrero was scared to engage and he's boring? Manny fights Clottey o man it's a great display of skill even though it was a boring as fight where manny couldn't land yet people make excuses for him and say it's Clottey fight manny couldn't change up his offense. Manny pummels dlh o man great fight he so action pack beating a dead man walking. Froch Throws jabs all night against Kesseler, with a few flurries and it was a great fight?. It goes on and on just admit your bias and leave it alone.
Now real great fights go a little something like this, Rios Alvarado 1 and 2, Pac Marquez 1,2. Floyd and Chavez, Floyd and Augusta, Tyson Holyfield, Bradly Provodniko, Just examples I could go on but the trend is these fights are fights where both guys get touched and It makes things intriguing.
Masterclass boxing examples. Whitaker vs dlh, Floyd vs Diego, Ward vs Dawson, Mares vs Ponce, Klits vs everybody as of late, Broner vs demarco. Juan Marquez vs Katsidis. Manny vs drained marg,
My point is fights where both guys are somewhat challenged Makes for great fights but we can't hate on a fight of fighter just because a fight looks good on paper then one guy gets in the ring and makes the other guy look like a fool. That's the problem with boxing fans. boxing fans need to be more like ufc fans.
Example, almost all gsp fights boring but I still like him because he in a class on his own, Silvia dominates most guys he fight but I still watch him, Cain Made big foot his biotch 2 times people still paid for that no complaints and feel satisfied doing so. All fights looked good on paper one guy outclass the other guy. Why is boxing held to such high standards?
Comment