wHICH FROCH KESSLER FIGHT WAS BETTER, FIRST OR SECOND FIGHT?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slimshandy69
    I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 3642
    • 323
    • 3
    • 16,514

    #1

    wHICH FROCH KESSLER FIGHT WAS BETTER, FIRST OR SECOND FIGHT?

    Mine goes for the second fight, Improved quality and action. What about you guys?
    18
    froch kessler 1
    50.00%
    9
    froch kessler 2
    38.89%
    7
    ward wont travel to nottingham
    11.11%
    2
  • Earl-Hickey
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 29031
    • 2,832
    • 1,384
    • 297,750

    #2
    I liked the second one more, it had more clean action

    Comment

    • .:: JSFD26 ::.
      Brawski
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 33329
      • 725
      • 432
      • 44,762

      #3
      I aLSO ThINK It wAs the SECoNd ONE.


      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

      Comment

      • boliodogs
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2008
        • 33358
        • 824
        • 1,782
        • 309,589

        #4
        I voted for the 2nd fight. there was a more clear winner in this fight but both fights were great fights.

        Comment

        • $Bullsfam$
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 10252
          • 813
          • 630
          • 46,956

          #5
          2nd fight but only because the crowd was more energetic then in Demark.

          Though the first was just as good. It was just the Nottingham crowd screamed even when Froch blinked.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP