Comments Thread For: Mikkel Kessler Admits Carl Froch's Pace Was Too Much

[rhalce]

Shame on what?

@HUGH JASS says "its a real shame on Kessler". SHAME ON WHAT? THERE'S NOTHING TO B ASHAMED LOSING TO A GREAT WARRIOR LIKE FROCH, KESSLER FOUGHT CLEAN & NEVER FOUGHT LIKE A QUITTER.

[HughJass]

@HUGH JASS says "its a real shame on Kessler". SHAME ON WHAT? THERE'S NOTHING TO B ASHAMED LOSING TO A GREAT WARRIOR LIKE FROCH, KESSLER FOUGHT CLEAN & NEVER FOUGHT LIKE A QUITTER.

i said it was a shame there had to be only ONE winner because of the way both performed and the way kessler conducted himself in defeat!!

everyone is entitled to there own opinion , that's mine.

[RightJab]

It wasn't just the pace though, Froch was Smash-Up Boxing Kessler all night, even a casual could tell that....

[Jloro]

Kessler didn't look bad, but it liked like he wasn't completely trying half the fight.

[doninlouisiana]

Froch was on a mission yesterday and was not to be denied. Kessler fought one hell of a fight and gave it his all, I think that if he had let his hands go more from the opening bell, he probably would have beaten Froch with his strength. I would love to see the rubber match Froch vs Kessler 3 maybe in Vegas.

[mshap]

Froch clearly won the fight but did it mainly with his jab and activity rate -- landed very few effective combinations and too often swung wildly with lead punches hitting nothing but air -- Froch is a very good all-around fighter but not in the elite class because of the obvious holes in his game....