Why is judging in boxing so wrong at times?

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • Luilun
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2010
    • 12457
    • 555
    • 94
    • 58,436
    #11
    Originally posted by Master Chief
    I am not sure on the age of the judge who gave it 118-112 but seriously, we need to have an age. Sight deteriorates pass 70 quite fast.
    Promoters pay off judges the days of paying fighters to take dives are over were into paying off Judges these days

      Comment

      • CraigM
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 2129
        • 57
        • 33
        • 12,128
        #12
        Yeah the 118-112 shocked a lot of us in the arena, a lot of us only had Carl by one or two rounds.

          Comment

          Previous 1 2 template Next
          Working...
          TOP

          Sign In

          Forgot password?

          Register

          Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
          JOIN NOW