Froch is so slow and skill-less he makes Danny Garcia look alright
Collapse
-
Even then though, a guy like Rigo pitching a shutout against Nonito is a better victory than Froch's victory over Kessler in 2013. So I really don't see his resume as a great deal. Beating Pascal, Bute, AA, Dirrel and Kessler. Truth to be told he lost to a younger Kessler, he should've lost the Dirrel fight , I though he lost 8 rounds. He got completely outclassed by Ward. So his best victories are Taylor (? at 168), AA (? at 168), Bute and Pascal. The win against Bute was the only great one, the Pascal fight was a back and forth battle just like it was today.Comment
-
I thought so before Taylor he has come along way, excellent at controlling distance and putting together hard combinations. For someone so slow he hits you with a lot of punches and he knows all to well how to work angles.
His chin is granite but what's even more impressive is that when he is hurt he has the best damn poker face.Comment
-
You couldn't even answer my question mother ****er. Why would I answer yours?
Froch is talented. He's ring savvy. He fights intelligently. He knows how to turn his opponents and probe. Those ****ty punches are him giving his opponents different angles to look at and he acts accordingly to how his opponent reacts to his probing. He allows himself to move to the left because he will step in or out depending on his opponent to nullify the impact. Froch does a lot of things right that you probably have zero clue about. He fights like an oldschool fighter. He makes it work for him too. Miguel Cotto is a slow as **** puncher too but nobody cares.
I'll answer you with Chris John. Nuff said.Comment
-
Chris John has less talent and skill than Froch. You're a wasteful poster to say the least!You couldn't even answer my question mother ****er. Why would I answer yours?
Froch is talented. He's ring savvy. He fights intelligently. He knows how to turn his opponents and probe. Those ****ty punches are him giving his opponents different angles to look at and he acts accordingly to how his opponent reacts to his probing. He allows himself to move to the left because he will step in or out depending on his opponent to nullify the impact. Froch does a lot of things right that you probably have zero clue about. He fights like an oldschool fighter. He makes it work for him too. Miguel Cotto is a slow as **** puncher too but nobody cares.
I'll answer you with Chris John. Nuff said.Comment
-
Comment
-
sure... compared to one fight....
Rigondo has only had one really great fight against another elite boxer (Donaire)... Froch has fought everyone worth fighting at 168 lbs... I still wouldn't put Froch above Rigondo (just based on skills) but no one can hate on Froch's resume... that's like hating on this slut's titaysSo I really don't see his resume as a great deal. Beating Pascal, Bute, AA, Dirrel and Kessler. Truth to be told he lost to a younger Kessler, he should've lost the Dirrel fight , I though he lost 8 rounds. He got completely outclassed by Ward. So his best victories are Taylor (? at 168), AA (? at 168), Bute and Pascal. The win against Bute was the only great one, the Pascal fight was a back and forth battle just like it was today.
Comment
-
I like how you slam Danny Garcia at the end... in actuality you just threw you boxing knowledge under a bus and let it bled out.Comment
Comment