Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Carl Froch v. Mikkel Kessler - Live Updates

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by fishscale View Post
    Did you look at the punch stats? Did you watch the fight? Are you serious? Kessler was on the verge of being stopped in the 12th. This was a close but clear win for Carl Froch 8-4/7-5.
    Froch was wobbled everywhere in the 10th still only 1 point round.

    punch stat example

    you landed 230

    I landed 178


    But if I win 7 rounds by 2 punches and you win 5 by the other margin, I still the win the fight.

    Win the round big or win it small - it's 1 point round without knockdown's etc

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Ravens Fan View Post
      His jab and Kessler's inactivity won the the fight for Froch. Kessler is also no where near the fighter he was a couple of years ago. I also find it rather strange that Carl is a unified champ and the man who beat him easily no longer even has an alphabet belt. I also give Ward credit for not overreacting to what Froch had to say. But than again I guess it would be easy to do when you know 100% that you really are the best.
      What was said to Ward, intrigued?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by SAJ10 View Post
        Froch was wobbled everywhere in the 10th still only 1 point round.

        punch stat example

        you landed 230

        I landed 178


        But if I win 7 rounds by 2 punches and you win 5 by the other margin, I still the win the fight.

        Win the round big or win it small - it's 1 point round without knockdown's etc
        Except Froch literally threw 2x the amount of punches and landed 100 more headshots. 10-8 rounds exist without knockdowns and regardless of that, Froch easily won 7 rounds. Everyone who watched this fight is saying the same thing, there was a clear cut winner here, Froch.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by anonymous2.0 View Post
          Ah man Ward, why not travel?
          No chance he travels to Uk now with that 118-110 scorecard.

          He had a hard enough time getting the judges to score the Froch fight fairly in his own country.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by fishscale View Post
            Except Froch literally threw 2x the amount of punches and landed 100 more headshots. 10-8 rounds exist without knockdowns and regardless of that, Froch easily won 7 rounds. Everyone who watched this fight is saying the same thing, there was a clear cut winner here, Froch.
            He missed most - and Froch was lunging in throwing inside cuffing shots and a lot were hitting gloves.

            I know you can get 10 8 rounds without knockdowns but I didn't see one in this fight.

            Most are Froch fans. I disagree, it's not the end of the world. Looking forward to seeing who he fights next.

            Comment


            • #36
              ward'll whoop froch..... and ward knows it....

              it's big money for ward, cos there's not too many options for him out there....

              as far as doing it in the uk, the money won't be as good.... they've got put big money on the table for ward.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by SAJ10 View Post
                No chance he travels to Uk now with that 118-110 scorecard.

                He had a hard enough time getting the judges to score the Froch fight fairly in his own country.
                Yes: he had the Brit judge scoring 118-110...

                Comment


                • #38
                  What a barfight! New millennium boxing toe to toe no science what so ever smfh

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Didn't expect anything less too warrior's

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      hope nobody took dwyers play on this fight, you're out some cash if you did lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP