I would basically compare these guys to Joe Frazier and Muhammad Ali, Hatton being Frazier and Mayweather being Ali, of course.
Hatton vs PBF: who is a better boxer?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by raesaadPBF....very good Boxer......Hatton very good fighter.Thats the way I see it.Comment
-
Originally posted by MoonA "boxer" actually "boxes". Hatton is a fighter, who has demonstrated some good but limited "boxing" skills. Hatton's success comes because his "fighter" skills, including his high-out move-forward style, have overwhelmed the combined "boxing" and" fighting" skills of his opponents.
How many Hatton fights have you seen?? You obviously haven't seen much of the guy.
Hatton has very good boxing skills, and is NOT a natural fighter (actually the complete opposite!). The 'pressure' style is exactly that, it's just a style. It's not Ricky Hatton. He's not a natural pressure fighter, he's been transformed into more of an attacker these last five years though. Against Tszyu, it was perfect tactics to smother him. Against Maussa, he looked horrible compared to his usual self and will admit that it wasn't exactly vintage Ricky Hatton.Comment
-
Originally posted by raesaadWhatever the amatuers were a long time ago read above what other people have said they seem to agree with me.....you act like I am taking something away from Hatton and I am not I am simply saying Floyd is a much more skilled BOXER than Hatton thats all.
And I'm the only one on this thread who has actually seen Hatton fight over the years.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Robinson CrusoeI would basically compare these guys to Joe Frazier and Muhammad Ali, Hatton being Frazier and Mayweather being Ali, of course.
Ali relied on his physical gifts (speed, reflexes, chin) whereas Mayweather relies on skill (blocking, parrying, shoulder roll).Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Queensdawgmayweather is a much better boxer.. hatton is a better fighter/brawler..
Both have skills but mayweathers are superiorComment
Comment