No need for part three.
Would you be down for Marg vs Cotto III?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Don't get me wrong, I could watch the cheater get beat up every day, but there is really nothing left to prove and his eye is already f'ed up anyways, no sense in another fight.
Also, if Margarito has any brain cells left after his beatings, he wouldn't want anymore of those.Comment
-
Whats the point? Margarito lost clearly last time and i think he's had enough damage for what he did, especially on the hands of Pac.Comment
-
Smh that this 'plaster' nonsense still get thrown around. Any of you fools ever heard about what happened when Boxing Illustrated tried to replicate the supposed 'plaster of paris' casts that Dempsey was supposed to have used against Willard?
http://coxscorner.tripod.com/dempsey_gloves.htmlComment
-
Originally posted by prinzemanspopa^^^^^^^
Guy's complaining about revisionist history.
If you're feeling generous, maybe the 7th...Comment
-
Of course I would under two conditions.
NO CATCHWEIGHT for this one. A lot of people don't know but Cotto demanded a catchweight of 150 first, which Margarito turned down and they ended up agreeing on a 153 lb catchweight.
And Cotto also demanded there be a rehydration clause from what I read. There should be none of that. If Cotto believes he's a true 154 lb fighter then there's no need for catch weights and rehydration clauses considering Margarito is in the same weight class.Comment
-
Margarito shouldn't be able to be liscenced anywhere! Cotto is a finished guy why fans on this site keep mentioning his name is beyond me! The guy can't win against the top tier guys because his tank is empty! Leave him alone!
Ray.Comment
-
No. The winner of Cotto vs Margarito II was Manny Pacquiao. What's the point in doing it again?
Unfortunately we will never know whether the first fight was a fair one or not.Comment
Comment