Better boxer Terence Crawford or Amir Khan?

[deejd]

Man looking at you're sig Matthysse is a little lucky Zab didn't sit down more on that uppercut that was perfectly timed punch.
Makes me shake my head on what a waste of talent Zab has been.
He could have been one of the greatest of all time with some more discipline and focus.

Thing about it is that that uppercut would drop, let alone rock any other '40-pounder. If anything, Judah gave everybody the gameplan on how to fight Matthysse if you can't hurt him; keep it in the center and do your best not to get touched.

[deejd]

With that being said, I actually think if Crawford gained a little more experience at the higher level and passed tests against the elite at either '35 or '40--as long as pitches a no-hitter, he could probably score a UD/SD against Matthysse.

[MJ223]

Khan until proven otherwise

[Roey Haque]

LOL. Bullying khan seems to be this site's prime hobby. I, like many others, loved Crawford's performance against Preiscot, and I for one value potential very highly.

So yes, he might have a chance against Khan, but why are we even speaking about this? Surely when one fighter is still is so green in facing A level competition, it is wise to keep him out of the conversation till he notches up a few more victories, no?

I voted "too close to call" as I'm not sure who the victor would be. I like Khan, thought he won against Peterson, was beaten by Danny, then wanted one easy fight with Molina, and I understand that, and he went on to demolish him. But with his second picking of an easy fight with Diaz( let alone the performance), he let me down. So I have to keep my mouth shut till I see him in there with an A level fighter again. Now had he fought someone more well known in his last fight, and pulled out the W, I would back him up fully against Crawford.