Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Martinez v. Murray: Where's the controversy?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
    If Sergio was throwing the harder shots why did he get dropped twice and cut? while Murray finished on his feet without a scratch on him
    he said martinez was throwing the harder shots not landing. murray was landing the harder shots which doesn't matter because we are in the joe calzaghe era of slap boxing your opponents gloves being just as good as actually hitting him.

    Comment


    • #12
      People need to open their eyes and stop calling Martin Murray a bum, just because he doesn't have killer power does not mean he isn't top Middleweight, watch his fights and stop typing ignorant shet.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
        If Sergio was throwing the harder shots why did he get dropped twice and cut? while Murray finished on his feet without a scratch on him

        When was Martinez actually hurt in the fight? The first "knockdown" came from a trip and the second supposed KD came from a grazing puch to the back of Sergio's head. Also, no one actually knows whether Martinez cut came from an actual punch, not that it matters.



        If you actually review the fight you'll see that Murray hardly threw or landed a punch in rounds 1-4. In fact, in round four Sergio landed a hard overhand left on Murray's face while Martin's best punch of the round came from a low blow. lol.

        In rounds 7, 11, and 12 Sergio landed multiple jabs and overhand lefts while pushing the action.

        Rounds 5 and 9 were toss up rounds.
        Last edited by BafanaBafana; 04-28-2013, 02:31 AM.

        Comment


        • #14
          argentinian comentators gave the fight to murray by 2 points...
          the fighter with more damage at the end of fight was martinez..

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by BafanaBafana
            I reviewed the fight, I thought Martinez won rounds 1, 2, 3, 4,7, 11, and 12 clearly. Murray won rounds 6, 8, and 10 clearly. Rounds 5 and 9 could have gone either way. The fight could have been scored 114-112 Sergio, 115-112 Sergio (as the judges had it), or 116-111 Sergio.

            I dare anyone to rewatch the fight and tell me Sergio didn't at least win rounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, and 12. Sergio was more active in those rounds and was also throwing the harder shots.
            I Agree lol. People on here *****in just trying to troll. Our they are ******ed or need more entertainment in their lives so they try to get reasons on the internet lol


            Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

            Comment


            • #16
              argentinian comentators gave the fight to murray by 2 points...
              the fighter with more damage at the end of fight was martinez..

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by BafanaBafana View Post
                When was Martinez actually hurt in the fight? The first "knockdown" came from a trip and the second supposed KD came from a grazing puch to the back of Sergio's head. Also, no one actually knows whether Martinez cut came from an actual punch, not that it matters.



                If you actually review the fight you'll see that Murray hardly threw or landed a punch in rounds 1-4. In fact, in round four Sergio landed a hard overhand left on Murray's face while Martin's best punch of the round came from a low blow. lol.

                In rounds 7, 11, and 12 Sergio landed multiple jabs and overhand lefts while pushing the action.

                Rounds 5 and 9 were toss up rounds.
                You biased twat, the two knockdowns were legit, both times he went down from punches

                That low blow was FAKE, Martinez feigned a low blow after a punch from Murray landed on his hip. pathetic

                the wuss also feigned a headbutt later on, so he could get some recovery time after he got stunned from an uppercut from Murray, and got away with it thanks to that **** biased referee

                Nobody is dis*****g that Sergio won the first 4 rounds, thanks to Murray's utter lack of activity, he was giving Sergio too much respect at first, undeservedly so, as soon as Murray started to let his hands go he was beating Sergio from pillar to post.
                Last edited by lopetego; 04-28-2013, 07:34 AM.

                Comment


                • #18
                  i have no problems with martinez winning but 2 3 and 4 were close, i gave 3 and 4 to murray

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    The controversy is that people saw someone they thought would blow through Murray look subpar, so now they have to either call robber or or demand Sergio retire.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      its amazing the double standards lol

                      people say canelo won because he landed cleaner and harder

                      people say bradley won because he landed more volume

                      murrey landed CLEANER, HARDER AND HE LANDED MORE. martinez won the first 3 rounds, after that he got his ass kicked, simple, he never won another round until 11 and then lost the 12th imo

                      it was a blatant robbery

                      edit

                      also the fact murrey won more rounds, he got 1 kd and got robbed another kd

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP