I am posting this to vent and to question in regards to the clinch. I was always under the assumption that clinching (i.e. holding) in boxing was technically illegal. Even though it is illegal, clinching to some degree is inevitable when two guys are attacking each other. But HOW DID IT EVER BECOME A CLEAR TACTICAL DECISION FREQUENTLY USED? In short, does anyone have any thoughts about how/why clinching has become so prevalent and tolerated in boxing today? I personally hate it. It ruins fights. I have often, in the heat of frustration, opined that the referee should have a 2 foot section of garden hose that he can whip viciously across the arms and shoulders of repeat (Ruiz-esque) offenders.
Your thoughts?
Your thoughts?
its just the nature of the game. And styles of the fighters seem to increase or decrease it. if both fighters ;like to come forward mostly they will clinch alot. Your not going to ko your opponent every time when your moving forward so your body will ofcourse crash into theirs. Clinching is just second nature when this happens. Yes for ruiz its very much part of his gameplan
but for the most part i think most fighters do it for the reasons above or for a breather or they are hurt. Its funny I havemore tolerance for clinchers than guys who run all night. There are ways around clinching!!!!!!. I think Its time for Tua to put the quiet man asleep again. But do you think ruiz would fight tua again! not a
chance
Comment