showtime commentating for canelo-trout worst i've ever heard

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #1

    showtime commentating for canelo-trout worst i've ever heard

    truely god awful, i know there are plenty of peeps on here that cry about how the commentary swayed them(and i always laught at those people) but it could explain the people that think trout somehow won, i thought canelo won hands down, and trout won only the rounds canelo let him

    but man, even malignaggi was in on this crazy bias, what the hell, they said trout won the rd after the kd and scored it a 9-9, SMDH

    canelo whooped that boy, bad
  • Snake...
    Banned
    • Aug 2011
    • 2167
    • 112
    • 27
    • 2,478

    #2
    Originally posted by TheHolyCross
    truely god awful, i know there are plenty of peeps on here that cry about how the commentary swayed them/people(could explain the people that think trout somehow won, i thought canelo won hands down, and trout won only the rounds he gave him)

    but man, even malignaggi was in on it, what the hell, they said trout won the rd after the kdand scored it a 9-9, holy f-ckin, damn son.... SMDH

    canelo whooped that boy, bad
    paulie can't score for ****

    he also had trout vs cotto a draw

    Comment

    • Cinci Champ
      And Still!!!
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2012
      • 9375
      • 301
      • 139
      • 23,582

      #3
      Originally posted by TheHolyCross
      truely god awful, i know there are plenty of peeps on here that cry about how the commentary swayed them(and i always laught at those people) but it could explain the people that think trout somehow won, i thought canelo won hands down, and trout won only the rounds canelo let him

      but man, even malignaggi was in on this crazy bias, what the hell, they said trout won the rd after the kd and scored it a 9-9, SMDH

      canelo whooped that boy, bad
      well you got to think it was not really the commentating it was fact trout controlled action for most round thats why it seemed that way. showtime had canelo winning anyway. canelo won imo he landed cleaner harder punches made more damage
      Last edited by Cinci Champ; 04-21-2013, 12:32 AM.

      Comment

      • mgsooner
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jul 2010
        • 331
        • 18
        • 7
        • 6,425

        #4
        If that's the worst commentary you've ever heard, you haven't been watching boxing long.

        Comment

        • -Kev-
          this is boxing
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 39960
          • 5,045
          • 1,449
          • 234,543

          #5
          Originally posted by Snake...
          paulie can't score for ****

          he also had trout vs cotto a draw
          Then I can't score for sh-t either. First time I had Cotto-Trout 6-6. Then I re-watched it and scored it 7-5 for Trout.

          Comment

          • DoubleMM
            hoodrat idiot gold tooth
            • Dec 2009
            • 3024
            • 410
            • 36
            • 36,691

            #6
            did you watch khan- garcia? garcia knocks him down, is beating the **** out of him in the following around and lampley screams "khan is coming back and winning the round!!!!!" then garica continues to beat the **** out of him.

            Comment

            • WarMaidana
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 2958
              • 124
              • 370
              • 12,923

              #7
              i thought commentary was bias for canelo

              Comment

              • BUNGALOWS
                undisputed champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2013
                • 6331
                • 326
                • 154
                • 7,018

                #8
                You do realize that they called the fight correctly, but were holding back on going full on Trout nut hugging, because they didn't want a million and 1 Mexican fans pissed off at them.

                They called it right, but their scorecards were all wrong.

                Comment

                • SplitSecond
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 23151
                  • 1,715
                  • 1,187
                  • 85,044

                  #9
                  Originally posted by -Kev-
                  Then I can't score for sh-t either. First time I had Cotto-Trout 6-6. Then I re-watched it and scored it 7-5 for Trout.
                  same score as you, i thought trout just pulled it out with 11 and 12 vs cotto

                  vs canelo tho, he didn't do much of anything accept get played in the palm of the mans hand

                  Comment

                  • PhooLzRUs
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 461
                    • 11
                    • 10
                    • 625

                    #10
                    Unusual with Paulie, his scorecard wasn't in agreement to what he was saying. His scorecard said Canelo was winning, but he was constantly saying how Trout was controlling the pace, and doing all the work most of the rounds. Even in the knockdown round he said Trout recovered well and scored it a 9-10.

                    I think Paulie was just scoring it in favor of Canelo, because that's what he was told to do, but deep down he knew Trout was winning, and if anyone should know how much it sucks to get robbed in texas, it should be Paulie.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP