Seriously, WTF was stanley chrisdodoodoo watching??

[crazyboy867]

118-109?....can someone please explain to me this guys scorecard.

[cupocity303]

Lets not fan the flames of robbery. We already have a thread going on this, with plenty of ******s up in arms, screaming robbery as if it was Trout that was ducking and dodging punches all night long, and not Canelo.

[prinzemanspopa]

[puga]

for real .. and that same f0cker was the same 1 judge from the wba ..

also , you would think a boxer like paulie would know how to score but he had cotto winning againts trout (or was it a draw which was still laughable) and was giving canleo rounds he was'nt even active in....

[crazyboy867]

im not saying it was a robbery but the fight wasnt that one sided.

[Bigg Rigg]

118-109?....can someone please explain to me this guys scorecard.

Idk wtf this idiot was watching. and I was going for Canelo. Smh horrible judging.

[deejd]

Couldn't care less who won the fight; it could have gone either way or even been a draw--but a 118-109 score in that fight, is simply atrocious.

[deejd]

Lets not fan the flames of robbery.

Who posted anything about a robbery in this thread? It's about the 118-109 scorecard. If you think that's justifiable, then you have a clear bias.

[AvoidDisaster]

Come on man... it's not funny to make fun of a blind man.

Funny thing is that he was supposed to be on Trout's side.