Adalaide Byrd, Judging at it's finest.
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Seriously, if judges used this simple formula instead of apparently confusing themselve, then we would have less robberies.
Although, I'm on the end of thinking 10-10 rds are more necessary.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Judging a round 10-10 seems like lazy judging to me....if a round is close you should be able to pinpoint the moment in a round that swings it in favor of one of the fighters.....which tells me you watched all 3 minutes of every round.Comment
-
In certain cases of course, it could be seen as lazy judging. Or it could also draw you to make distinctions between the fighters that just aren't there. They should be not commonplace or anything, but they're 10-10 rounds and should be judged as so. Just like judges should give out 10-8 rounds for more than just KD's, but also for dominant rounds when a fighter hurts his opponent, but doesn't put him down, or doesn't get a ruled KD, i.e. Bradley-Provodnikov.Comment

Comment