How do you personally determine P4P rankings?

[VG_Addict]

What factors do you include to make a P4P list? Rounds won? Quality of competition the fighter in question has faced in his weight classes? Whether the fighter's skills/physical abilities, such as speed and power stay consistent when they move up in weight?

[PAC-BOY]

What factors do you include to make a P4P list? Rounds won? Quality of competition the fighter in question has faced in his weight classes? Whether the fighter's skills/physical abilities, such as speed and power stay consistent when they move up in weight?

you just make up some shlt. Thats how how the sanctioning bodies do it.

[Bitel Diamond]

Level of Opponents, Performance, History, Divisional Championships, Boxing Skills

[LacedUp]

If everyone was the same size, who would win.

[boliodogs]

I go by how good I think the fighter is for his size in the weight class he currently competes in. How good he used to be in a different weight class means nothing to me. He could have been a great light heavyweight but if he is competing as a heavyweight and he is just an average heavyweight then I rate him as average. My pfp. rating is based on how good the fighter is now not how good he was a year or two ago. If a fighter moves up a weight class or more he has to prove himself all over again becaause it's pfp. and his weight is bigger and he must compete with bigger, harder hitting fighters. I had Donaire at #1 but Rigo knocked him out of that spot. I can't give Rigo the #1 spot yet on only 12 fights and one super win. I put Rigo at about #5 but if he backs the Donaire win with other good wins then he will soon be #1. Donaire drops to about #8 for his poor performance. If he moves up to 126 I have to see how he does at that weight before rating him.

[Juanma9]

By assessing skills, technique, and athletic abilities such as speed and power. Also asking, when appropriate, who beats who: this means Pac vs. Floyd, but not Ward vs. Broner. The top fighters are complete, well rounded, and do not rely exclusively on their size.

Resume plays a part, but somewhat secondary, as it is useful for assessing a boxer skill, but loses relevance as time goes by. Activeness and level of competition is key. You can't be p4p today, if you're banking on a dated performance. This is true in every sport, but I feel that the boxing stars often get a pass.

Lastly, P4P lists are subjective, but I do think that there is such a thing as a credible list.

[Gudfella]

Level of Opponents, Performance, History, Divisional Championships, Boxing Skills

gud summary...nd activity level


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android