I feel like Trout has done more than Canelo just with his one fight with Cotto. I mean maybe to some people's eyes, that's not a big deal. But even if it's true, it's still more than what Canelo has done. It has to be, right? The only way I see people ranking Canelo higher is if they are ranking him based on his potential. Because I really do see great potential in Canelo as well. But I thought ranking was based on what fighters have done. Not what they're going to do. I feel like potential should have nothing to do with ranking.
Why do people rank Canelo higher than Trout?
Collapse
Comment