Adrien broner vs these opponents at 140

[F l i c k e r]

Matt and khan beat him for sure. Khan loses to punchers with strong wills. Not boxers who like to fit in the pocket.

Marquez is a toss up. He's older but his experience may be the difference. Hard to say.

The rest, he can beat.

[Kingjames6Flee]

Yeah.....sure! Cool of you to mention fighters from 10 years ago LOL!

Well currently broner is my favorite. I like nonito alot as well. Danny garcia also. Don't come at me bro making assumptions. You say I only follow two fighter yet all I asked was a question about broner. It's not as if I'm consistently making threads on broner this was my first one. Relax man. Just because I have pics of floyd and broner doesn't at all validate your statement pertaining to who I follow. Chill out

[Build That Wall]

broner beats them all

Broner vs Khan: Khan's chin is weaker than a bubble. Broner wins, easy work.
Broner vs Rios: broner vs rios is like abril vs rios and broner ends up winning all 12 rounds
Broner vs Lucas: A test but broner knocks him out in rd 10
Broner vs Garcia: somebodies 0 has got to go and that 0 that will go is garcias
Broner vs Peterson: Easy work
Broner vs Marquez: Broner establishes himself as the future of boxing.

[F l i c k e r]

Which fight?

1 and 3. The draw and the one where marquez clearly boxed his ears off but lost anyways.

[BoxingGenius27]

1 and 3. The draw and the one where marquez clearly boxed his ears off but lost anyways.

The 3rd fight was a robbery yes, but I don't really think the third fight was a war at all. Marquez just clearly won the fight.

The first fight was a war, yes. The reason why I don't think it was a robbery was because of the knockdowns. That really put Marquez in a difficult situation. I would say he possibly squeaked out a victory, but I'm not to sure I would call it a robbery.

A robbery to me is:

Lewis-Holyfield I
DLH-Mosley II
Williams-Lara
Quartey-Forrest
Mathysse-Alexander
Cassamayor-Santa Cruz - Probably one of the biggest in history

Sure, Pac-Marquez I was a close fight that could've gone either way, but I don't think I would call it "robbery" per se.

[F l i c k e r]

I see what you mean. Maybe it's their history together that makes me see it as a robbery. But it was indeed a close fight.

Casamayor- Cruz, just seeing it mentioned, my goodness.

[BoxingGenius27]

I see what you mean. Maybe it's their history together that makes me see it as a robbery. But it was indeed a close fight.

Casamayor- Cruz, just seeing it mentioned, my goodness.

Off the top of my head, that's the first fight where I've seen a guy win essentially every round and lose the fight.