Comments Thread For: Photo: Floyd Mayweather Jr. Already Close To 147 Limit

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mathed
    molṑn labé
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 54549
    • 2,741
    • 2,984
    • 224,675

    #101
    Originally posted by craigus1990
    Are you f***ing insane? On these scales he is 148.2. Against Cotto in the weigh in he was what 151? Man that's 3 pounds. As if you could f***ing tell what 3 pounds of difference looks like on someone. People gain and lose 3 pounds in an hour and you're telling me you can tell the difference? You're an idiot.
    Yeah, I can tell the difference when I go to the gym and lose 1.5 pounds or 2 pounds of water weight, only an idiot would say that two pounds of water weight is not noticeable. You obviously can see the difference in thos pics from the Cotto fight, care to explain it away?

    I can only assume you don't know shizz about working your ass off in gym. Three pounds is half a weight division.....

    Comment

    • craigus1990
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 1094
      • 116
      • 80
      • 8,010

      #102
      Originally posted by mathed
      Yeah, I can tell the difference when I go to the gym and lose 1.5 pounds or 2 pounds of water weight, only an idiot would say that two pounds of water weight is not noticeable. You obviously can see the difference in thos pics from the Cotto fight, care to explain it away?

      I can only assume you don't know shizz about working your ass off in gym. Three pounds is half a weight division.....
      I'm in amazement of your ******ity. You cannot tell if someone is 3 pounds heavier or lighter by looking at them.
      Let's for the benefit of the doubt pretend you can tell on yourself, there is still no way you can tell on another human being by looking at his back.
      You are just claiming things you can't prove. People on this website really don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.
      Even if he did from the front and back look drastically different from the Cotto fight, what would that prove? That in a year his body has changed from what it had when he was in fighting condition?
      You know you can weigh the same and look different? I can lose muscle and gain water and fat and weigh the same, did it occur to you people change?
      Moron.

      Comment

      • The Gambler1981
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2008
        • 25961
        • 520
        • 774
        • 49,039

        #103
        Originally posted by mathed
        Yeah, I can tell the difference when I go to the gym and lose 1.5 pounds or 2 pounds of water weight, only an idiot would say that two pounds of water weight is not noticeable. You obviously can see the difference in thos pics from the Cotto fight, care to explain it away?

        I can only assume you don't know shizz about working your ass off in gym. Three pounds is half a weight division.....
        You want to know the key difference~

        The word I

        You see yourself constantly so it is possible you could tell in relation to yourself, but you aren't Floyd so you don't see him near as often and what he looks like with a number on a scale~

        Quit talking out of your ass~

        Comment

        • BlackSnakeMamba
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jun 2010
          • 630
          • 61
          • 31
          • 7,391

          #104
          Lucas "The Bum Stopper" Matthyse weighed in at 163 lbs againts Mike "Taxi Driver" Dallas. A past his prime Zab Judah out boxed him. Peterson via UD or 12th round TKO.

          Comment

          • mathed
            molṑn labé
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 54549
            • 2,741
            • 2,984
            • 224,675

            #105
            Originally posted by craigus1990
            I'm in amazement of your ******ity. You cannot tell if someone is 3 pounds heavier or lighter by looking at them.
            Let's for the benefit of the doubt pretend you can tell on yourself, there is still no way you can tell on another human being by looking at his back.
            You are just claiming things you can't prove. People on this website really don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.
            Even if he did from the front and back look drastically different from the Cotto fight, what would that prove? That in a year his body has changed from what it had when he was in fighting condition?
            You know you can weigh the same and look different? I can lose muscle and gain water and fat and weigh the same, did it occur to you people change?
            Moron.
            You are the freakin moron bro, I originally said that he looked in the mid 150's. I later said that he looked closer in the weigh in to the way he looked in the picture posted today than in the Cotto fight. Mid 150's is not the same as 151 first off, secondly, 2 or 3 pounds of water weight is phuking noticeable. The body only holds about 7 gallons of water total, a gallon is a little over 8 pounds. Three pounds of water is 5% of the total amount of water in your body. You can't survive with under 85% water.....that's why you can live without out food for weeks but die within days without water.

            Don't come at me like you have smarts because you are obviously ignorant as hell man. Get a grip on what the phuck you are talking about before spouting dumb stuff.

            Comment

            • ShoulderRoll
              Join The Great Resist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 55911
              • 10,022
              • 5,016
              • 763,445

              #106
              lol

              Just admit you were wrong, mathed.

              Unless you think Floyd is directly misleading us in that pic for some reason. Or that the WBC is lying about their 30 day weigh in.

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #107
                Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                You want to know the key difference~

                The word I

                You see yourself constantly so it is possible you could tell in relation to yourself, but you aren't Floyd so you don't see him near as often and what he looks like with a number on a scale~

                Quit talking out of your ass~
                Dude, he looks much leaner in the pictures that I posted from the Cotto fight than in the pic posted today.....could be a camera angle or maybe it's not. At least i have pictures to back up my "opinion" that he looks heavier than 148...you are the one talking out of your ass. You have nothing to back up your argument but an insult.....insults don't hold any water or weight (pun intended)

                Comment

                • mathed
                  molṑn labé
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 54549
                  • 2,741
                  • 2,984
                  • 224,675

                  #108
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                  lol

                  Just admit you were wrong, mathed.

                  Unless you think Floyd is directly misleading us in that pic for some reason. Or that the WBC is lying about their 30 day weigh in.
                  I'm not wrong at all.....this whole thing is based on an "opinion" that he looks heavier than 148. Does that mean he is? Absolutely not. Compared to other photos, he looks heavier, he could have more or less muscle than he did in those other photos. Too many people are used to this good versus bad thing when it comes to Floyd....I merely stated an opinion and some people want to wage a war. F-that, I can use numbers to prove you or anyone else is wrong for trying to state things as facts if need be.

                  It's a fat versus muscle thing, muscle is more dense than fat, that could explain everything but people want to jump in and say "you're wrong"or whatever. I never said he wasn't 148.9....that's what people took away from what I posted though.

                  Comment

                  • The Gambler1981
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 25961
                    • 520
                    • 774
                    • 49,039

                    #109
                    Originally posted by mathed
                    Dude, he looks much leaner in the pictures that I posted from the Cotto fight than in the pic posted today.....could be a camera angle or maybe it's not. At least i have pictures to back up my "opinion" that he looks heavier than 148...you are the one talking out of your ass. You have nothing to back up your argument but an insult.....insults don't hold any water or weight (pun intended)
                    Ever heard that looks can be deceiving~

                    I have actual weight numbers on my side and with Floyd they really don't fluctuate much.

                    3 pounds out of 147 is 2%, your eyes aren't calibrated to that level of accuracy unless you see something every day and even then I would venture 95% would not tell a difference.

                    You are talking out of your ass period that isn't an insult that is calling a spade a spade~

                    Comment

                    • The Gambler1981
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 25961
                      • 520
                      • 774
                      • 49,039

                      #110
                      Weight is a quantitative measurement meaning it is what it is and can be measured~ I don't give a shit about a qualitative argument in relation to something that can be measured very accurately.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP