Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo-Trout: Saul Aims To Add Trout's Record To List

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    They still haven't mentioned any of the fights on the undercard?? That's really not a good sign at all

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by AP♠ View Post
      Pretty lame to compare those bottom barrel bums to Trout.I'm feeling awkward about this fight even being in Texas,I mean why? Vegas is the boxing capital of the world and Canelo should be a hot ticket there already especially now since the pacifier is off so why Texas with all of its previous su****ions? I'll have my live scorecard in hand...we KNOW how Texas has preference.
      Boxing was at its peak when it was on the road. Yes there should always be a place in Vegas for the biggest of fights but in order to build the sport and fighters there should be fights outside of Vegas.

      Comment


      • #13
        Cotto was tagging dat azz thoght

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
          Yes yes, we know. But now..... can you tell me how many a those guys were jr middleweights?? I got all day, yup.
          OMG!!! Look at that resume, the guy fights nothing but the best!

          Managers Jose and Chepo Reynoso point out that Canelo is no stranger to facing, and beating, another undefeated fighter. Miguel Vazquez tasted defeat in his pro debut when he faced Canelo in January 2006 in Guadalajara. To this list were added Pedro Lopez and Javier Martinez. Then later on was Gabriel "Rey" Martinez (17-0-1, 9 KO's), and then Euri Gonzalez (17-0-1, 12 KO's) in February 2009 in Zapopan.
          Lol, isn't Vasquez a lightweight?

          Comment


          • #15
            Trout it getting too much credit for beating cotto!!! For someone not that quick (anymore) cotto was he getting in and out with ease in some parts of the fight

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by BabyFaceAssasin View Post
              They still haven't mentioned any of the fights on the undercard?? That's really not a good sign at all
              It's two undefeated champions fighting on a non-ppv network card wtf else do you want

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by SugarAnt05 View Post
                Cotto was tagging dat azz thoght
                obviously he was getting tagged himself because he lost.

                Comment


                • #18
                  They're listing a bunch of cab drivers though. I'm not impressed beat Trout convincingly with no robbery and I'll become a believer.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by BTTAG145 View Post
                    They're listing a bunch of cab drivers though. I'm not impressed beat Trout convincingly with no robbery and I'll become a believer.
                    It really is that simple. Count me as a believer if he convincingly beats Trout with no robbery.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by SugarAnt05 View Post
                      Cotto was tagging dat azz thoght
                      Trout beat the FAR BETTER Cotto and Canelo was badly hurt by the FAR LESSER Cotto.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP