P4P discussion.

[junior gong]

From what I understand about P4P, it has nothing to do with how a fighter does in his next fight. "Example" Nonito vs Rig... People say if Nonito beats Rig he should move up the P4P list?
From what I understand tht's a divisional rise, not a P4P rise. In fact I don't even think there is a such thing as P4P #2, #3 and so on.

When Ray was appointed P4P, who was #2?

P4P was invinted to judge who was the best fighter of them all, combine style, ability, skill ect ect.....
Who's style/skill would carry thru the weights, that's how you judge the P4P best.

But now we have fused divisional rankings in with it..... Whats up with that?

No it isnt.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Broner and Guerrero are on the P4P list ahead of Bradley(in Guerrero case,which he clearly should not be)and Broner is ahead of Pac Wlad and Bradley..Enough said..

I respect the ring Mag and their rankings,it's opinion..Just have ya own..Any knowledgeable fan knows Mares and Froch belong on the P4P list in stead of either Guerrero or Broner..But any knowledgeable fan also knows that manipulation is part of the game as well..Which is obviously being done in this case..