Comments Thread For: Photos: Cotto-Trout Shot By Hogan Gets Top BWAA Prize

[Bushbaby]

Because Cotto is Cotto. Trout even by winning still aint ****.

So if the winner ain't ****, what does that make the loser??

[AnimalisticMeth]

So if the winner ain't ****, what does that make the loser??

A top 3 draw in the sport.

[Main Source]

Ok, kool an all. But why is the only picture up there one of the loser landing a great shot against the winner??

Because it's a great photograph? It doesn't have anything to do with the outcome of the fight.

[mex602]

A top 3 draw in the sport.

lmao

OWNED!!!!!

[Bushbaby]

A top 3 draw in the sport.

Cotto is not a top 3 draw anymore. That loss pretty much secured it. This coming from a Cotto fan, unbiased though. (The difference between us).

[New England]

Ok, kool an all. But why is the only picture up there one of the loser landing a great shot against the winner??

because that has nothing to do with the award.

a picture is objective. it doesn't care who won the fight.

[UTEP]

Ok, kool an all. But why is the only picture up there one of the loser landing a great shot against the winner??

It's just a picture!

[paulf]

I mean, it's a good shot, but it doesnt do much for me...

[JAW]

So if the winner ain't ****, what does that make the loser??

Past his prime and under-sized for the division.

[JAW]

because that has nothing to do with the award.

a picture is objective. it doesn't care who won the fight.

Educated, maybe? Common sense, certainly! Very intelligent response. This is a really nice shot (the punch as well) and the fight was fairly close anyway (which is irrelevant). Why does anyone care who is the puncher and who is the punchee?