Timothy Bradley vs Adrien Broner

[Bossy]

if Broner is as hard a puncher as Ruslan, then Bradley loses... if not Bradley will gut it out barely... but who knows GBP might pay off judges to keep Broner from losing

But if Bradley didn't lose with Ruslan, why would Broner having the same punching power make a difference?

I think Experience would come into play. Bradley has more experience with top and elite fighters, he would out box Adrien all night long.

[SUBZER0ED]

Broner can actually punch with speed and power. Bradley can't punch very hard, which is strange, because he looks strong. If Bradley beats Broner soundly (which I doubt), I'll give him props. If not, and Broner stops Bradley (more likely), my su****ions that Bradley is a good but not great fighter will be somewhat proven.

[SUBZER0ED]

But if Bradley didn't lose with Ruslan, why would Broner having the same punching power make a difference?

I think Experience would come into play. Bradley has more experience with top and elite fighters, he would out box Adrien all night long.

Am I missing something? How many "top and elite" fighters has Bradley fought?

[Scarcaztic]

Am I missing something? How many "top and elite" fighters has Bradley fought?

Are you serious bruh??? Alexander, Peterson, Holt (prime), Pacquiao, Witter, Campbell.

That resume takes a hot, stinky, dump on Broner's. You can go on and on about how those guys besides Pacquiao are garbage, but the truth is, you beat those guys, and you're proven.