TS sounds like the people that is wrong with boxing.
He rather have everyone just agree, boxing is subjective. There will always be side A that say this fighter won or side B that says this side won.
When you ignore that fight and fail to look at a fight objectively and find yourself in side A or B you are no longer a boxing fan rather a casual fan with more knowledge then normal.
TS
List the scoring criteria and tell me which one Broner won and which one Paulie won?
See post # 5 for clarification before making knee-jerk hysterical posts like this.
Sure, Pauli vs Broner was competitive, but it was crappy competitive fight. Pauli threw a thousand boring pitty pats while Broner boringly only threw a few hard punches every round. It's not a fight I should be excited about and Broner deserves whatever criticism he's getting.
exactly, paulie was a 11 to 1 underdog and everyone knew he had no power from the jump.
when that Mexican vs Bika was the best fight of the night and it was the opening card you know that night was a stinker.
Tweet
Comment