I agree with Silencer.
Reasons:
1. Pacquiao is considered 1-dimensional. Morales losing to 1-dimensional fighter is bad... really bad for his career.
2. Suppose, you argue that Pac is 1-dimensional but too powerful. Then why did JMM lasted 12 rounds. And Morales is supposed to have the toughest chin among the 3 M's.
3. Suppose, you argue that Morales has the tendency to brawl. Then he is more a moron than we thought of. Why? We know the answer. This moronic attitude will degrade him.
Now, if Morales lost. Who will be his options? C'mon guys. Give the list.
Perhaps Morales can take on JMM. Hahaha!!! How much? Can they still demand like they used to?
Or Morales moves up and gets avoided.
But if Pacquiao beats him, then I'm gonna say that Corrales knocks him out just by the sheer difference in power.
Reasons:
1. Pacquiao is considered 1-dimensional. Morales losing to 1-dimensional fighter is bad... really bad for his career.
2. Suppose, you argue that Pac is 1-dimensional but too powerful. Then why did JMM lasted 12 rounds. And Morales is supposed to have the toughest chin among the 3 M's.
3. Suppose, you argue that Morales has the tendency to brawl. Then he is more a moron than we thought of. Why? We know the answer. This moronic attitude will degrade him.
Now, if Morales lost. Who will be his options? C'mon guys. Give the list.
Perhaps Morales can take on JMM. Hahaha!!! How much? Can they still demand like they used to?
Or Morales moves up and gets avoided.
But if Pacquiao beats him, then I'm gonna say that Corrales knocks him out just by the sheer difference in power.
Comment