which is more respected?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • leathernvouges
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Feb 2012
    • 398
    • 17
    • 0
    • 12,054

    #1

    which is more respected?

    A fighter who wants to fight the best fights out there and risk his record or the fighter who maneuvers around certain ppl and take a fight with less risk, even tho this is a buisness and i guess if they r going to pay u the same amount to take the fight with less risk is actually smarter?
    Im actually linking this question to amir khan alot of ppl dont give him his credit but to me it seems he has always wanted to fight the best fighters, now he might not give a rematch but he wants the toughest fights but since he lost a few ppl wont give him credit
  • RayCharles
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jun 2012
    • 165
    • 12
    • 42
    • 289

    #2
    The guys who will fight anybody are more respected

    The guys who pick and choose are smarter and ultimately the ones who get remembered more than the former type

    Comment

    • DLT
      DMV
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 17087
      • 737
      • 35
      • 24,277

      #3
      look, Ive defended Khan in alot of threads but lets not overrate his courage either. He fought alot of good fighters but he was suppose to be great.

      In most of those fights, people thought he would clearly win. He was suppose to beat Peterson & Garcia without too much trouble so lets not act like they were pickem fights or people saw them as such.

      He was suppose to be good enough to clearly beat them and fight Mayweather next. He didnt. Part of the reason we see them as great fighters he fought is strictly because they beat him. We could easily be looking at LP & Garcia differently if Khan clearly beats them like he was suppose to

      Comment

      • leathernvouges
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Feb 2012
        • 398
        • 17
        • 0
        • 12,054

        #4
        he was robbed vs peterson though it was close, and was whoppin on garcia but got a little greedy made a mistake and paid for it but why do ppl think he's a c maybe a b class fighter @ best but broner is world class fighter and hasnt fought anybody

        Comment

        • RayCharles
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jun 2012
          • 165
          • 12
          • 42
          • 289

          #5
          Originally posted by DLT
          look, Ive defended Khan in alot of threads but lets not overrate his courage either. He fought alot of good fighters but he was suppose to be great.

          In most of those fights, people thought he would clearly win. He was suppose to beat Peterson & Garcia without too much trouble so lets not act like they were pickem fights or people saw them as such.

          He was suppose to be good enough to clearly beat them and fight Mayweather next. He didnt. Part of the reason we see them as great fighters he fought is strictly because they beat him. We could easily be looking at LP & Garcia differently if Khan clearly beats them like he was suppose to
          I agree

          Khan didnt take those fights thinking they were tough fights. He fully expected to school both and was wrong

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP