Compubox Claims "Margin of Error" Within 2%

[S. Saddler 1310]

I doubt they are that accurate, although some fights are easier to count than others.

My question is many networks (and Fans) almost seem to depend on them though and actually tend to score rounds based on the data they receive from them.

There is something called "quality of shots" that many now seem to ignore.

and Bingo was his name.


CB is practically worthless.

[Russian Crushin]

Yeah, I know they're wrong sometimes. What they're saying is, over the "big picture" they are within 2%.

I think slow paced fights they are closer to being right but faced paced fights with a quick puncher who throws a lot, they can be really wrong

Calzaghe landed probably not even half of what compubox said he did against Hopkins

[johnm is...]

I think slow paced fights they are closer to being right but faced paced fights with a quick puncher who throws a lot, they can be really wrong

Calzaghe landed probably not even half of what compubox said he did against Hopkins

Yeah, I'm sure this is probably the case.

I really wish they would review the tape of the fight afterward, and recount. Could even get a count on particular punches.

[ИATAS]

I think slow paced fights they are closer to being right but faced paced fights with a quick puncher who throws a lot, they can be really wrong

Calzaghe landed probably not even half of what compubox said he did against Hopkins

It wasn't even half. They had him landing 208 I believe.

Anyways, 2% is impossible to know unless they go back and watch the tapes which Im sure they don't care to do since there is no other "compubox" to compete with.

[Russian Crushin]

It wasn't even half. They had him landing 208 I believe.

Anyways, 2% is impossible to know unless they go back and watch the tapes which Im sure they don't care to do since there is no other "compubox" to compete with.

It was more like 232 i think

Its like Psychics saying they are right 90% of the time, made up BS stat