You're not making a lot of sense here bro. All I'm saying is that Cotto didn't have to fight Trout, nobody was even really asking for that fight. Cotto took it for whatever reason and paid the price, end of story. I don't get where you came up with this idea that Cotto had to fight Trout in order to get Canelo.
Miguel Cotto vs Victor Ortiz
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by _original_Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuauhtémoc1520
Hahaha, do you really believe that? Look man no disrespect but #1 they have two different promotional companies. #2 The winner of Cotto vs Trout was supposed to be to fight Canelo.
Canelo was the ultimate goal in both Trout and Cotto, he's where the money is at. Unfortunately Trout threw a monkey wrench in Cotto's plans and set him back.
You won't find a bigger fan of Canlo's than Cotto when he fights Trout. Cotto wants a couple of last big paydays before he calls it quits.
Cotto is a warrior but you need to understand the way the boxing biz works, Cotto like every other fighter is seeking the bigger money fights and that's with Canelo.
You're not making a lot of sense here bro. All I'm saying is that Cotto didn't have to fight Trout, nobody was even really asking for that fight. Cotto took it for whatever reason and paid the price, end of story. I don't get where you came up with this idea that Cotto had to fight Trout in order to get Canelo.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
You're not making a lot of sense here bro. All I'm saying is that Cotto didn't have to fight Trout, nobody was even really asking for that fight. Cotto took it for whatever reason and paid the price, end of story. I don't get where you came up with this idea that Cotto had to fight Trout in order to get Canelo.
What they really wanted was Cotto to beat Trout and then set up a big fight on PPV between Canelo and Cotto, Trout ***ed that up. K9 was never in the picture.
Goldenboy didnt even want the Trout fight...they openly expressed this... it was Cotto's choice...it definitely wasnt a semi-final for Canelo.... Cotto wanted the belt i guess for bargaining chips during negotiation for the Canelo fight... (ring walk, announcing, money)
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
Originally posted by thatdudespitsQuote:
Originally Posted by _original_
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuauhtémoc1520
Hahaha, do you really believe that? Look man no disrespect but #1 they have two different promotional companies. #2 The winner of Cotto vs Trout was supposed to be to fight Canelo.
Canelo was the ultimate goal in both Trout and Cotto, he's where the money is at. Unfortunately Trout threw a monkey wrench in Cotto's plans and set him back.
You won't find a bigger fan of Canlo's than Cotto when he fights Trout. Cotto wants a couple of last big paydays before he calls it quits.
Cotto is a warrior but you need to understand the way the boxing biz works, Cotto like every other fighter is seeking the bigger money fights and that's with Canelo.
You're not making a lot of sense here bro. All I'm saying is that Cotto didn't have to fight Trout, nobody was even really asking for that fight. Cotto took it for whatever reason and paid the price, end of story. I don't get where you came up with this idea that Cotto had to fight Trout in order to get Canelo.
Goldenboy didnt even want the Trout fight...they openly expressed this... it was Cotto's choice...it definitely wasnt a semi-final for Canelo.... Cotto wanted the belt i guess for bargaining chips during negotiation for the Canelo fight... (ring walk, announcing, money)
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1520Quote:
Originally Posted by _original_
You're not making a lot of sense here bro. All I'm saying is that Cotto didn't have to fight Trout, nobody was even really asking for that fight. Cotto took it for whatever reason and paid the price, end of story. I don't get where you came up with this idea that Cotto had to fight Trout in order to get Canelo.
Because it was already being discussed. Cotto vs Canelo was the fight they wanted but wanted to lagitimize the fight with the belt.
What they really wanted was Cotto to beat Trout and then set up a big fight on PPV between Canelo and Cotto, Trout ***ed that up. K9 was never in the picture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatdudespits
Goldenboy didnt even want the Trout fight...they openly expressed this... it was Cotto's choice...it definitely wasnt a semi-final for Canelo.... Cotto wanted the belt i guess for bargaining chips during negotiation for the Canelo fight... (ring walk, announcing, money)
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
You just answered you're own point there....lol
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
Comment
-
Because it was already being discussed. Cotto vs Canelo was the fight they wanted but wanted to lagitimize the fight with the belt.
What they really wanted was Cotto to beat Trout and then set up a big fight on PPV between Canelo and Cotto, Trout ***ed that up. K9 was never in the picture.
l
Honestly, who gives a crap about belts? Canelo-Cotto didn't need to be legitimized by some crappy alphabet soup belt; the fight was going to sell regardless.
Who was "they" that wanted Cotto to beat Trout? If you're referring to Golden Boy, I'm sure they would have much rather preferred Cotto to take a much easier fight to make their mega fight.
I never said that K-9 was ever in the picture, I just stated that if Cotto was so desperate for a belt (as you claim), then he could have just easily fought K-9 for his belt.Comment
-
Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1520Quote:
Originally Posted by _original_
You're not making a lot of sense here bro. All I'm saying is that Cotto didn't have to fight Trout, nobody was even really asking for that fight. Cotto took it for whatever reason and paid the price, end of story. I don't get where you came up with this idea that Cotto had to fight Trout in order to get Canelo.
Because it was already being discussed. Cotto vs Canelo was the fight they wanted but wanted to lagitimize the fight with the belt.
What they really wanted was Cotto to beat Trout and then set up a big fight on PPV between Canelo and Cotto, Trout ***ed that up. K9 was never in the picture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatdudespits
Goldenboy didnt even want the Trout fight...they openly expressed this... it was Cotto's choice...it definitely wasnt a semi-final for Canelo.... Cotto wanted the belt i guess for bargaining chips during negotiation for the Canelo fight... (ring walk, announcing, money)
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
You just answered you're own point there....lol
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
-
Honestly, who gives a crap about belts? Canelo-Cotto didn't need to be legitimized by some crappy alphabet soup belt; the fight was going to sell regardless.
Who was "they" that wanted Cotto to beat Trout? If you're referring to Golden Boy, I'm sure they would have much rather preferred Cotto to take a much easier fight to make their mega fight.
I never said that K-9 was ever in the picture, I just stated that if Cotto was so desperate for a belt (as you claim), then he could have just easily fought K-9 for his belt.
GB wanted Cotto vs Canelo, that was the route they would have preferred. Bigger money fight.
I didn't imply anything like that, I basically am saying the same thing you are saying. GB wanted Cotto vs Canelo, they said it many times, it was the biggest fight available. Why do you think Trout was so happy to get Canelo? He's the cash cow right now.Comment
Comment