Would you rather be a small HW or a huge middleweight?

[croz]

Hypothetical situation

Say you're starting late into boxing, you're in your twenties, fast and have a killer punch, which path do you think is likely to lead you to the most success, being a 6"3 young athletic HW among today's crop or being 6"3 in today's batch of middleweights (including SMW).

So you'll be small but fit in a division that is currently lacking stellar talent, or a giant in a division packed full of talent.

[Bushbaby]

A huge middleweight obviously. Being a small heavyweight would be that much harder. And unless your coaches school you on the importance of body punching, (a lost art up there). You're only going so far.

[BoxingFollower]

huge middleweight, I fit that criteria as well.

[gmc_rfc_06]

The Klitschko's are gone soon, Haye will go with them...that leaves a dead division to rack up wins, money and belts.

Not to mention, I like smaller, faster HW's.

[D-MiZe]

Big middleweight, then move up divisions and end at heavyweight. Doesn't work the other way around.

[Rip Chudd]

I'm 6'5 and couldn't make middleweight if you chopped off my legs. I'll stick to heavyweight

[NearHypnos]

I'd rather be huge in any weight than undersized. I'd rather take my chances with a Quillin than a K Bro...