Originally posted by Rip Chudd
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why does Lamont Peterson always get a pass or the benefit of the doubt?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Money_May View PostWith steroids, a bias ref a home crowd and corrupt judges he still only get a disputed SD lol.
the ref was bad but if anyone benefited it was khan. neither of the KDs were legit, yet he got a free point from one. and he should be glad he got away with just two point deductions, he could very well have been DQed and it wouldnt have been unfair in any way.
Originally posted by wazaa. View Postyeah well...
How would you feel if your wife cheated on you by giving me hardcore sex? Would you just get over it and go down on her like nothing happened even though my Rambo cleaned that place out? Or would you get a divorce?
Answer me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wazaa. View PostVictor Ortiz vs. Lamont Peterson
The vast majority had Ortiz winning the fight.
Result: The fight somehow gets concluded as a draw.
Amir Khan vs. Lamont Peterson
A close fight in which the majority had Amir winning the fight (Including the two deducted points).
Result: Lamont Peterson gets the win
Lamont Peterson gets caught using steroids
Lamont gets caught with steroids because of random drug testing. Evidence shows that Lamont had an abnormally high testosterone level in his December 10th fight against Khan. Lamont most likely thought that the enhanced testosterone level was back to normal. He was wrong. It takes a longer period for the testosterone level to turn back to their normal level.
Result: Lamont doesn't get suspended, he can keep his purse money and the IBF lets him keep the belt.
Lamont Peterson fights Kendall Holt
The broadcasters portray him as the victim of the system and he gets a pass for using steroids in the Khan fight.
What is it about Lamont that either gets him the benefit of the doubt or a pass in his wrongdoings?
Is it because of his tough upbringing story?
Because he is an American? It's not uncommon for American athletes to use performance enhancement drugs. See for example boxers like Tony, Holyfield, Vargas and Mosley. Lance Armstrong being one of the biggest cheaters in the history of any sport.
Or is it simply because of his puppy wuppy eyes?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bee Keepz View PostWhat happened to your crusade in cleaning up the sport?
Comment
-
Originally posted by fitefan View Postyou do realize why he was allowed to keep his belt, right? he agreed to have his medical records reviewed by another doctor and they confirmed his condition
I hope he's clean, but I'm not convinced.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChrisTLD View PostWhat you said reminds me of this part in the Hauser article:
That led Ryan Connolly to observe that more than a few elite athletes suffer from hypogonadism and note, “This may seem odd since these athletes are physical specimens. How can they be so muscular and fit but have natural testosterone production deficiencies at a higher rate than ordinary people? The dirty little secret is not necessarily that these athletes are lying about their hypogonadism. The dirty little secret is the likely cause of the hypogonadism in the first place - past anabolic steroid abuse.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View PostIt brought his testosterone levels up to NORMAL. It wasn't any bullcrap like the guy Mickey Bey where his testosterone levels were crazy high.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View PostWhat the heck are you even talking about man? Get Floyd's nuts out of your mouth and realize this thread has nothing to do with him. Go jump off a bridge. SMH, I swear idiots on this site man.
I find it funny you're defending a PED user...lol.
Comment
Comment