Stronger Comeback: Mitchell or Price?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kiaba360
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 19155
    • 2,326
    • 3,488
    • 45,265

    #1

    Stronger Comeback: Mitchell or Price?

    Two top HW contenders with hype behind them have lost their last fights in dramatic fashion. Which fighter do you believe will bounce back better from their defeat?
    9
    Mitchell
    0.00%
    0
    Price
    33.33%
    3
    Both are hype-jobs and won't amount to anything
    66.67%
    6
  • White_Knight
    At a lady's service
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2011
    • 2626
    • 213
    • 474
    • 9,122

    #2
    Probably Price. He has a solid amateur background to rely on, whereas Mitchell is more or less learning the ropes as he goes. Also, Mitchell's team exercised the rematch clause with Banks, which I think is a bad idea and shows he doesn't have the wisest people behind him. There is no way Mitchell could adjust his style in such a short period of time.

    On the other hand, Mitchell is younger. This is in his favour.

    Comment

    • Earl-Hickey
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 29031
      • 2,832
      • 1,384
      • 297,750

      #3
      Originally posted by HooksInYou
      Probably Price. He has a solid amateur background to rely on, whereas Mitchell is more or less learning the ropes as he goes. Also, Mitchell's team exercised the rematch clause with Banks, which I think is a bad idea and shows he doesn't have the wisest people behind him. There is no way Mitchell could adjust his style in such a short period of time.

      On the other hand, Mitchell is younger. This is in his favour.
      Mithchell is older....

      And both are bums, will never be anything special

      Comment

      • kiaba360
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 19155
        • 2,326
        • 3,488
        • 45,265

        #4
        Originally posted by HooksInYou
        Probably Price. He has a solid amateur background to rely on, whereas Mitchell is more or less learning the ropes as he goes. Also, Mitchell's team exercised the rematch clause with Banks, which I think is a bad idea and shows he doesn't have the wisest people behind him. There is no way Mitchell could adjust his style in such a short period of time.

        On the other hand, Mitchell is younger. This is in his favour.
        Mitchell turns 31 this year, while Price turns 30. Mitchell also became a pro a year earlier.

        Comment

        • White_Knight
          At a lady's service
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 2626
          • 213
          • 474
          • 9,122

          #5
          My mistake. For some reason I thought Mitchell was 28.

          Comment

          • yoz
            Yoz
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2011
            • 8617
            • 439
            • 427
            • 16,868

            #6
            They should fight each other...

            Comment

            • The Gambler1981
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2008
              • 25961
              • 521
              • 774
              • 49,039

              #7
              I would say neither, but if I had to pick one it would be Price because he is big enough that he could fight in a way that could limit the potential fire that comes back.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP