Why VADA is more trustworthy than USADA

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Light_Speed
    SPEED IS POWER
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2010
    • 11518
    • 384
    • 1,427
    • 18,341

    #1

    Why VADA is more trustworthy than USADA

    VADA automatically notifies the commission when a fighter tests positive for PEDs, that's the reason why Golden Boy stopped using them and went with USADA who have done some shady things. They didn't notify the commission when Morales tested positive, instead they kept taking samples from him until he tested negative. They tested Quillin and Winky but then two days later abandoned the testing at Golden Boy's request and destroyed the samples when they're supposed to keep them for 6 years.

    VADA caught Peterson and Berto who works with Conte (there goes the conspiracy theory).

    All in all, VADA is a much more trustworthy organization than USADA.
  • TRTboy
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2012
    • 3377
    • 90
    • 4
    • 16,860

    #2
    After the quillin and morales controversy I don't trust USADA.

    Comment

    • techliam
      Caneloweight Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 5526
      • 371
      • 23
      • 42,424

      #3
      Truth is, noone apart from VADA or USADA know the inner workings of these organisations, so concluding stuff like this to make a point is pretty ******.

      Comment

      • DoktorSleepless
        DoktorWakeless
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2010
        • 11473
        • 440
        • 186
        • 27,349

        #4
        Broner and Demarco also signed up for USADA, but they didn't test either them even once. They later gave a BS excuse about not having enough time to educate them first.

        Comment

        • Light_Speed
          SPEED IS POWER
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2010
          • 11518
          • 384
          • 1,427
          • 18,341

          #5
          Originally posted by techliam
          Truth is, noone apart from VADA or USADA know the inner workings of these organisations, so concluding stuff like this to make a point is pretty ******.
          Regardless of the inner workings, there are facts we can use to assess whether an organization is trustworthy. I listed those facts, ignoring them would be the ****** thing to do.

          Comment

          • Phenom
            Phenomdeaux
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 12218
            • 494
            • 363
            • 101,474

            #6
            you got your info wrong they waited too long to notify the commsion and GBP when Peterson tested positive which he did on late March they informed Peterson of the positive result on April 13 and to the commission and Khan Camp on May I think a week before the fight

            Comment

            • Check_hooks
              The Don of NSB
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 12099
              • 966
              • 1,875
              • 25,959

              #7
              That Thomas Hauser article really ethered USADA and alot of boxers

              I don't trust them, GBP and Al Haymon fighters at all

              Comment

              • Phenom
                Phenomdeaux
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 12218
                • 494
                • 363
                • 101,474

                #8
                I know Pactards hate USADA because of the whole Pacquiao being scared of needles thing but seriously come on now VADA is the organzation the brought down Armstrong VADA was one that was created by Conte as cheap alternative for USADA to fighters who don't make Mayweather money

                Comment

                • Light_Speed
                  SPEED IS POWER
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 11518
                  • 384
                  • 1,427
                  • 18,341

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Phenom
                  you got your info wrong they waited too long to notify the commsion and GBP when Peterson tested positive which he did on March 19 they informed the commission and Khan Camp on May I think a week before the fight
                  No, Peterson gave samples on March 19th but sample A only came back positive on April 12th. VADA asked team Peterson if they wanted the B sample to get tested which they did. Because of laboratory schedule, the B sample was tested at the end of April and on May 3rd it came back positive and VADA informed the Nevada commission. Do your homework.

                  Comment

                  • Phenom
                    Phenomdeaux
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 12218
                    • 494
                    • 363
                    • 101,474

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Light_Speed
                    No, Peterson gave samples on March 19th but sample A only came back positive on April 12th. VADA asked team Peterson if they wanted the B sample to get tested which they did. Because of laboratory schedule, the B sample was tested at the end of April and on May 3rd it came back positive and VADA informed the Nevada commission. Do your homework.
                    keep in mind that test was done in press conference and was only reported positive a week before the fight almost 2 months later

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP