Originally posted by JAB5239
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The notion that older Heavyweights couldn't beat Heavyweight's the size of today
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Cutthroat View Post
Only truly great fighters that were in extraordinary shape could dominate Wlad, I mean just look at those bulging biceps, that pumped up chest, shredded back and abdomen!
**** happens.
But that doesn't negate the overall argument that today's "new era" of Lennox-Klitschko sized HWs are a different breed and would destroy the previous era's HWs most of the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Nephilim View PostYou're not fooling anybody. If Arreola was dominating right now we wouldn't hear all of the trash talk about him. He'd just be another "great" Amerikan heavyweight in the supposed long line of them.
It's easy to look at fighters who were heavily hyped in Amerika like Sam Peter (not Amerikan but black, close enough), Calvin Brock, Arreola, and others, and dismiss them as "garbage" and whatever now that they've been destroyed by a Klitschko.
However, if there had never been any Klitschkos and these guys were dominating, the hype machine for them would have continued. There's no reason why it wouldn't have.
It's all a matter of how these things are portrayed in the corrupt Amerikan sports media.
I hate Arreola, seriously. Always have.
My favorite heavyweights right now are younger guys coming up, like David Price, Bryant Jennings, Malik Scott, etc. Or even Steve Cunningham, who easily beat Adamek and was robbed.
I'm not debating that Wlad and Vitali are good fighters, they are. The level of opposition hasn't been there though. Even Holmes, who fought in a weaker era, given what happened before and after his era, had better opposition in Shavers and an older Norton. If Shavers and Norton were fighting today and in the heavyweight picture, they'd beat everyone with the exception of the Klitschko's.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4Corners View PostJust watch footage of some of the 90's heavyweight fights, and than watch everyone you just mentioned.....
I hate Arreola, seriously. Always have.
My favorite heavyweights right now are younger guys coming up, like David Price, Bryant Jennings, Malik Scott, etc. Or even Steve Cunningham, who easily beat Adamek and was robbed.
I'm not debating that Wlad and Vitali are good fighters, they are. The level of opposition hasn't been there though. Even Holmes, who fought in a weaker era, given what happened before and after his era, had better opposition in Shavers and an older Norton. If Shavers and Norton were fighting today and in the heavyweight picture, they'd beat everyone with the exception of the Klitschko's.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostOf course it would, but not nearly as much as you'd like to think. Proof of this is how many of these fighters did against one another in the amateurs. Why weren't Ali, Frazier, Foreman and even the likes of Pete Radamacher being blown out then against grown men? Face it, these things run in cycles.
Oh, and Joe Louis destroys every fighter today.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4Corners View PostJust watch footage of some of the 90's heavyweight fights, and than watch everyone you just mentioned.....
I hate Arreola, seriously. Always have.
My favorite heavyweights right now are younger guys coming up, like David Price, Bryant Jennings, Malik Scott, etc. Or even Steve Cunningham, who easily beat Adamek and was robbed.
I'm not debating that Wlad and Vitali are good fighters, they are. The level of opposition hasn't been there though. Even Holmes, who fought in a weaker era, given what happened before and after his era, had better opposition in Shavers and an older Norton. If Shavers and Norton were fighting today and in the heavyweight picture, they'd beat everyone with the exception of the Klitschko's.
Comment
-
Originally posted by r.burgundy View Posteven ali said joe louis had the bum of the month club.alotta people want to rewrite history and act like everybody who joe fought was a great fighter,who would dominate any era,and anybody but joe louis.the guys he fought were freaking laughable.tony gallento wouldnt even be sancntioned to fight today
the 'olden days' nostalgia must always be tempered by the fact no fighters from communist countries were allowed to fight pro. and this is when most of eastern europe and all russia was communist
it cant be a coincidence that since the iron curtain came down the east europeans have dominated. not sdaying they would have in the 60s, 70, 80s but there would have been a fair amount of big russians competing at the top level who would have surely have some of the titlesAscended likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by r.burgundy View Posteven ali said joe louis had the bum of the month club.alotta people want to rewrite history and act like everybody who joe fought was a great fighter,who would dominate any era,and anybody but joe louis.the guys he fought were freaking laughable.tony gallento wouldnt even be sancntioned to fight today
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andrew5050 View PostOk so you just discredited your own thread. The older hws couldn't beat the super sized hws of today
But they would be able to beat these heavyweights the Klitschko's have had to face.
Comment
Comment