I've seen him from 4-13 on most respectable lists...but yeah he usually comes in around 5 or 6ish...I actually had stronger wording favoring him but edited it down while I was correcting a grammatical error, and if I had edited it back it would've shown a "post edited" which I hate.
Duran is top 10 in almost every experts ATG p4p list. Why is this even a question? What the hell is the OP thinking.
I just wanted to make this point:
A fighter like Floyd can be considered good even if he cherry-picks, never fights away from home, and never fights a bigger man (never takes any risks).
But such a fighter cannot really be great like a Sam Langford, Harry Greb, Henry Armstrong or Roberto Duran.
Floyd lack's the warriors' heart those men had, and without that, he's not a truly great fighter like Duran.
Duran wasn't a bad fighter,he had his moments..but to compare him to mayweather it's just ******.Mayweather is a true champ..duran had no mental strenght..after a while he was just a fat drug loving alcoholic fat boy who didn't even have the power to control his own life let alone his boxing career.
Comment