Who should get paid more the champ or the current attraction in the sport for example,pacquaio and hatton aren't world champs, but they are some of the main attractions to the sports right now...So who should get paid more and dictate the terms of the fight?
Champ or Attraction?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
i think the Champ. Only because he is the champ and whether people think it or not, the best in the world. That is what being the champ signifies. -
Originally posted by Mr. UntouchableWho should get paid more the champ or the current attraction in the sport for example,pacquaio and hatton aren't world champs, but they are some of the main attractions to the sports right now...So who should get paid more and dictate the terms of the fight?
Boxing is part business...so I say whoever can fill those seats deserves the money they earn.Comment
-
If it's a mandatory, and it is the challenger who wants to enforce it, the champ should get more - it doesn't matter how much of a draw the challenger is, he'll get the chance to earn the higher percent if he becomes champ. Of course promotors/fighters should be allowed to negotiate a higher percent for the challenger if they want to entice a popular fighter who will attract the cash.Comment
-
case in point DLH - Hopkins, who got the money, who the fans come to see and who made the fight ... its all business
I do agree that the champion deserves a big purse but would that champ earn the same purse if he will fight another guy ???
PAC-EM, both of them are hot but EM is hotter so he is asking for 3M, and i think HBO and Top Rank will gladly give it to him, what you think guys ???Comment
Comment