Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khabib-Prescott Done: Hyrunov Expects a Tough Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
    Yes, and then proceeded to lose to Alvarado, Mcklosky (lol), Mitchell (lol), and Vasquez. Why didnt he KO any of those guys, 2 of which are chinny as hell?

    Khabib deserves alot of credit for it, he was an under dog and went in there and beat Guzman up, who has a very tricky style and fought him like a vet and showed he's a real player. Stop overrating Prescotts 30 second win over Khan
    Khan, Mitchell, and Vasquez are all pretty good fighters dude.. just because people don't go undefeated over the course of their career doesn't mean they aren't good fighters. I'm a big fan of Lil Floyd but I think cuz of the fact that he's undefeated makes you people a little delusional. Khabib has had 18 fights, 18.. Prescott has 20 KO's! more KO's than Khabib has fights, you measuring Khabib off what? Guzman and Mabuza? You're in for a rude awakening and so is Khabib..

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Realizniguhnit View Post
      Khabib hasn't beat anything but washed up fighters so I'm not sure where you are getting at? I just look at it from a match up stand point. Who has all the advantages? Prescott! Bigger, Taller, Longer, Stronger, Quicker, Prime, More experienced...ect people making too much over Khabib victory over a has been in Guzman. I never said Prescott was this great boxer, but Khabib's nothing special either...Prescott wins easy just off of ability, Khabib was bigger than Guzman but he won't be bullying Prescott around like that..
      Who has Prescott beat? You talk about overrating Khabib but you're overrating Prescott even more

      Prescott wins easy? What ability, the ability to lose to any decent fighter he has ever faced. Didnt Prescott have all those "advantages" over all the fighters he lost to?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Realizniguhnit View Post
        Khan, Mitchell, and Vasquez are all pretty good fighters dude.. just because people don't go undefeated over the course of their career doesn't mean they aren't good fighters. I'm a big fan of Lil Floyd but I think cuz of the fact that he's undefeated makes you people a little delusional. Khabib has had 18 fights, 18.. Prescott has 20 KO's! more KO's than Khabib has fights, you measuring Khabib off what? Guzman and Mabuza? You're in for a rude awakening and so is Khabib..
        And the majority of those Prescott KOs were where again?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Realizniguhnit View Post
          Seriously if Mabuza is all you can come up with then you might as well not even mention him...
          I mentioned Mabuza because he has the same attributes you mentioned that Prescott had. Mabuza made Holt quit on his stool and was controlling the whole fight with Judah before he got stopped. Not to mention Mabuza lost his pro debut to a guy who later be became ww champion by beating Delvin Rodriguez. Khabib will win this fight without too much trouble. And when he beats him you'll probably say Prescott is washed up too.
          Khabib will give a lot of guys at 140 a tough fight. He a southpaw that throws well to the head and body. He can fight going forward and backwards, Prescott doesn't have good stamina and no plan b if his fight isn't working. Khabib only has 18 fights as a pro and while his completion hasn't been great its been pretty good. Campbell, Mabuza, and Guzman were all past their prime but they were all still competent durable fighters and he destroyed Mabuza. He probably would've stopped Guzman too if he didn't injury his leg and Guzman had never been stopped.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
            Who has Prescott beat? You talk about overrating Khabib but you're overrating Prescott even more

            Prescott wins easy? What ability, the ability to lose to any decent fighter he has ever faced. Didnt Prescott have all those "advantages" over all the fighters he lost to?
            No, see thats why you don't know boxing, Khabib isn't a boxer, he's a pressure fighter, the fights that Prescott lost for the most part he was out-boxed except for Alvarado where he beat himself, and he really didn't lose to Mccloskey. Khabib was able to bully the smaller Guzman but he won't be able to bully Prescott... As long a Prescott sticks to his jab and keeps Khabib at bay, Khabib won't stand a chance..

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Realizniguhnit View Post
              Khan, Mitchell, and Vasquez are all pretty good fighters dude.. just because people don't go undefeated over the course of their career doesn't mean they aren't good fighters. I'm a big fan of Lil Floyd but I think cuz of the fact that he's undefeated makes you people a little delusional. Khabib has had 18 fights, 18.. Prescott has 20 KO's! more KO's than Khabib has fights, you measuring Khabib off what? Guzman and Mabuza? You're in for a rude awakening and so is Khabib..
              You dont have to go undefeated but if you're losing to guys ranked in the 10-20 range in a division, and basically all you have is power, then yea you're not beating a fighter like Khabib

              Mitchell, McClosky Alvarado are average fighters, thats it. Yes im measuring Khabib off his wins to Mabuza and Guzman, while you're measuring Prescott by his loses to guys like Mitchell and McClosky, see the Irony here? Even if he beat those guys, Mabuza and Guzman would still be better wins

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by RyunosukeRonin View Post
                And the majority of those Prescott KOs were where again?
                It doesn't matter where, you didn't even know who Khabib was 3 years ago where did most of his wins come from again?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by bigcursedawg View Post
                  I mentioned Mabuza because he has the same attributes you mentioned that Prescott had. Mabuza made Holt quit on his stool and was controlling the whole fight with Judah before he got stopped. Not to mention Mabuza lost his pro debut to a guy who later be became ww champion by beating Delvin Rodriguez. Khabib will win this fight without too much trouble. And when he beats him you'll probably say Prescott is washed up too.
                  Khabib will give a lot of guys at 140 a tough fight. He a southpaw that throws well to the head and body. He can fight going forward and backwards, Prescott doesn't have good stamina and no plan b if his fight isn't working. Khabib only has 18 fights as a pro and while his completion hasn't been great its been pretty good. Campbell, Mabuza, and Guzman were all past their prime but they were all still competent durable fighters and he destroyed Mabuza. He probably would've stopped Guzman too if he didn't injury his leg and Guzman had never been stopped.
                  Holt?... lol just stop it man... I stopped reading there..

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Realizniguhnit View Post
                    No, see thats why you don't know boxing, Khabib isn't a boxer, he's a pressure fighter, the fights that Prescott lost for the most part he was out-boxed except for Alvarado where he beat himself, and he really didn't lose to Mccloskey. Khabib was able to bully the smaller Guzman but he won't be able to bully Prescott... As long a Prescott sticks to his jab and keeps Khabib at bay, Khabib won't stand a chance..
                    And Prescott is boxer? Khabib is a boxer puncher. He's sure as hell a better boxer then Mitchell and McClosky, and also has a chin. Apparently Prescott is not some kind of boxer who beats guys in fantasy match ups yet loses to guys nowhere as good in real life

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
                      You dont have to go undefeated but if you're losing to guys ranked in the 10-20 range in a division, and basically all you have is power, then yea you're not beating a fighter like Khabib

                      Mitchell, McClosky Alvarado are average fighters, thats it. Yes im measuring Khabib off his wins to Mabuza and Guzman, while you're measuring Prescott by his loses to guys like Mitchell and McClosky, see the Irony here? Even if he beat those guys, Mabuza and Guzman would still be better wins
                      He did beat Mccloskey fool lol.. Do you know what a robbery is?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP