At 147 who do you want Floyd to fight?

[Bushbaby]

people kept mentioning trout......floyd ain't fighting at 154 unless there's some money up there(cotto/dlh/canelo all money fights).....trout is good but he should fight canelo to make a case.....even he knows that....thats why you don't really hear him calling out floyd. do people really think floyd would go out of his comfort zone for less money?

Floyd won't make any less fighting Trout than he would anyone not named ginger.

[hugh grant]

1-Guerrero-ya'll ****ted on that even tho its his mandatory

2-Alexander-ya'll ****ted on this to although he is the IBF champion and a 2 division champion


so damn who do you want him to fight at 147???

Look youve got to look at the bigger picture and understand the reasons people ***** on FLoyd. He is supposed to be the best boxer in the world, and hes supposedly not boxing on much longer.

We dont mind if he fights Alexander, so long as 3 months later he fights Guerrerro. If he beats Guerro then he can fight Pac 6 months later. I think you see what im getting at, you have to fight everyone, all potential challengers if you are a proffesional boxer.

If he fights Alexander at the expense of fighting Sergio or Canelo thats why he is being criticised for his potential opponents. He fights so little and irregularly the Alexanders of this world wont cut it for supposedly the best boxer in the world.
I personally think Alexander would test Floyd, but that is cos i dont rate Floyd as highly as others do, but if theoretically lets pretend Floyd really is the best boxer, then fighting Alexander dont cut it for someone weve lavished praise as the best fighter on.
But your damn right no one wants to see Floyd fight Alexander, and then wait another year or so for his next fight. If people have to wait a year or so for his next fight Guerrero wont cut it as well.

[The Big Dunn]

Look youve got to look at the bigger picture and understand the reasons people ***** on FLoyd. He is supposed to be the best boxer in the world, and hes supposedly not boxing on much longer.

We dont mind if he fights Alexander, so long as 3 months later he fights Guerrerro. If he beats Guerro then he can fight Pac 6 months later. I think you see what im getting at, you have to fight everyone, all potential challengers if you are a proffesional boxer.

If he fights Alexander at the expense of fighting Sergio or Canelo thats why he is being criticised for his potential opponents. He fights so little and irregularly the Alexanders of this world wont cut it for supposedly the best boxer in the world.
I personally think Alexander would test Floyd, but that is cos i dont rate Floyd as highly as others do, but if theoretically lets pretend Floyd really is the best boxer, then fighting Alexander dont cut it for someone weve lavished praise as the best fighter on.
But your damn right no one wants to see Floyd fight Alexander, and then wait another year or so for his next fight. If people have to wait a year or so for his next fight Guerrero wont cut it as well.

Does this apply to whoever you think is the best boxer in the world? Or does he get to fight a string of fights against guys who are 4-1 underdogs but have more name value than the 4-1 underdogs floyd fights?

So manny should not fight jmm 5 and fight alexander or guerrero-whoever floyd doesn't- then 3 months later fight the other, then in 6 mos floyd. Right?

[I Love Jesus!]

1-Guerrero-ya'll ****ted on that even tho its his mandatory

2-Alexander-ya'll ****ted on this to although he is the IBF champion and a 2 division champion


so damn who do you want him to fight at 147???

Since you care about what we want we'd like to see you stop being the #1 floyd **** rider on planet earth for once in your life groupie...


You hate on boxingscene posters extra hard calling them haters and acting like floyd is your lover

[UrDazed]

Guerrero would be great. Marquez 2 in all honesty. who else is he gonna fight?

[kiaba360]

I would like for him to fight both Guerrero and the winner of Brook/Alexander in one year, or don't fight at all.

[hugh grant]

Does this apply to whoever you think is the best boxer in the world? Or does he get to fight a string of fights against guys who are 4-1 underdogs but have more name value than the 4-1 underdogs floyd fights?

So manny should not fight jmm 5 and fight alexander or guerrero-whoever floyd doesn't- then 3 months later fight the other, then in 6 mos floyd. Right?

Look at Pacs resume or last 5 fights or so. He is fighting every 6 months or so, JMM, bradley and JMM again. Great fighters back to back on a regular basis. Floyd wants to fight alexander types and then take a year off or even longer? No thats why if Floyd is the best fighter hes got to mix in his own circles. The Sergios, Canelos, Pacs, Bradleys of this world he has to fight back to back regularly.
Alexander isnt the best in the world regardless whether he is a champ now or not. Alexander hasnt developed a reputation for being especially dangerous opponent, or hasnt shook up the world of boxing in anyway shape or form, unlike Bradley who beat Pac, or Canelo who has developed a formidable reputation whether people think he has fought great fighters or not or Trout who looks pretty impressive

The only reason Floyd would be fighting alexander types as that is the level Floyd is at, and i think it is, mixing in his own circles.

[straightleft]

all top rank fighters man

and
1-Manny just went 0-2 in 2012 and got sparked out

2-Jmm really???he already dominated him 4 years ago and got 0 credit for it

Floyd will never fight Pacquiao. Your coward boy is a loose p*u*s*s*y who cherry pick his easy opponents then sell to his gullible fans.

[Chuckguy]

Yavuz Ertuk!!! Or retire

[Trophyboy23]

Pac @147, Canelo@154, and Martinez @154, if he does that ill give him all the props in the world.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android