Pick Mayweather's next opponent @147 - who SHOULD it be?

[Cinci Champ]

Why 147 when he just fought at 154lb. Where's the Carmelo option?

same reason pac dont like to fight at 154 anymore. even when fighting at 154 he weighs in at 150 i dont see why this is so hard to understand for people its like you wont be happy unless someone has a 20 pound weight advantage on fight night. they said one main reasons contract taking so long is they have a built in agreement that if both canelo and floyd win on may 4th then they will fight in sep

[elfag]

there aint much at 147 anymore. Fight cinnimon face at 154 now and pac in the fall. arum is probably read to throw pac under the bus by now

[KING MEAT]

martinez.

/thread.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[Weebler I]

Aside from Berto, the list is all natural 140 pounders. Do yo work for Mayweather or something. Tell him the real money is at middleweight or light middleweight!

Ain't that the truth.

147 is as dead as the HW division, the JWW's stepping up chasing the May/Pac money like the cruisers stepping up to chase the Klit money.

It's fcuking the game up too, because 140 would be electric with all those fighters there.

Anyway, to answer the question, Pacquiao or Bradley.

Clottey is a better fight than Guerrero or Alexander, he would mash both.

[NEETzsche]

bradley or guerrero would be solid fights.

[Imatroll]

same reason pac dont like to fight at 154 anymore. even when fighting at 154 he weighs in at 150 i dont see why this is so hard to understand for people its like you wont be happy unless someone has a 20 pound weight advantage on fight night. they said one main reasons contract taking so long is they have a built in agreement that if both canelo and floyd win on may 4th then they will fight in sep

Pac specifically stated he wont be fighting up there after the 150lb catch weight with marg. When did mayweather say he's not fighting at 154lb? The guy fought at 154lb twice. No reason for him to duck the division.

[Prince-Naz]

Pacquiao >>>>>>>> all those bums